Compare Istra vs Genk

Istra vs Genk Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Istra vs Genk: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Istra Home Team

Genk Away Team

Istra

35.8

W W L L L L L W W L

Last 10 Matches

Genk

50.6

W L D D W D W D L W

Categories Won

Istra

Draw

Genk

Performance Radar

Istra

Genk

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

40%

4W, 0D, 6L

40%

4W, 4D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match

1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-3

Clean Sheet

20%

2 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

40%

4 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

40%

4 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

S. Prevljak (4 goals)

A. Bibout (4 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 4

1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 10

Home Win Rate

33%

2W / 6 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

50%

2W / 4 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

34.5

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 47.2

56.0

League Difficulty: 60.6, Opponent Quality: 52.9

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 1 matches

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

0.93

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.07

1.53

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.07

Adjusted Power Rating

35.8

Attack: 28.2, Defense: 47.9, Form: 33.8

50.6

Attack: 56.5, Defense: 49.5, Form: 42.4

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Istra

Genk

Power Rating Breakdown

35.8

Overall

Attack 28.2

Defense 47.9

Form 33.8

Consistency 35.2

Power Rating Breakdown

50.6

Overall

Attack 56.5

Defense 49.5

Form 42.4

Consistency 56.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 60.6

Opponent Quality

47.2 vs 52.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Istra

Genk

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Osijek A

Croatia Prva HNL

1 - 0 W

46%

Slaven H

Croatia Prva HNL

3 - 1 W

35%

Gorica A

Croatia Prva HNL

0 - 1 L

50%

Dinamo Zagreb H

Croatia Prva HNL

0 - 2 L

71%

Vukovar H

Croatia Prva HNL

1 - 2 L

32%

Lokomotiva A

Croatia Prva HNL

0 - 2 L

49%

Hajduk H

Croatia Prva HNL

1 - 3 L

53%

Varaždin H

Croatia Prva HNL

2 - 1 W

48%

Rijeka A

Croatia Prva HNL

2 - 0 W

48%

Osijek H

Croatia Prva HNL

0 - 1 L

40%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Westerlo H

Belgian First Division A

3 - 0 W

45%

Charleroi A

Belgian First Division A

0 - 2 L

51%

Standard H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 1 D

55%

Charleroi H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 1 D

46%

Westerlo A

Belgian First Division A

2 - 1 W

50%

OHL H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 0 D

47%

Antwerp A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 1 W

57%

La Louvière A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

5 - 5 D

54%

Freiburg A

UEFA Europa League

1 - 5 L

69%

Sint-Truiden H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 0 W

55%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Genk has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 56.0) compared to Istra (SoS: 34.5). This means Genk's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Genk holds the attacking edge with 1.6 goals per match versus Istra's 1.0, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Istra has the defensive edge, conceding 1.3 per match compared to Genk's 1.6.

Genk has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Genk has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 14.8 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Istra

Genk

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair