Skip to content
Compare Karviná vs Brann

Karviná vs Brann Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Karviná vs Brann: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Karviná Karviná Home Team
Brann Brann Away Team
Karviná
40.4
W L L W W L D L L L

Last 10 Matches

Brann
45.1
W W D L L W L L L L

Categories Won

3

Karviná

4

Draw

8

Brann

Performance Radar

Karviná
Brann

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 1D, 6L

30%

3W, 1D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-5

-5

+5

+5

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
Kahuan Vinícius (2 goals)
K. Ingason (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 5
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
55.3

League Difficulty: 58.0, Opponent Quality: 53.5

42.3

League Difficulty: 57.0, Opponent Quality: 55.6

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.36

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: -0.16

2.14

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.24

Adjusted Power Rating
40.4

Attack: 42.1, Defense: 45.6, Form: 31.6

45.1

Attack: 58.5, Defense: 49.2, Form: 27.7

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

1
1

16-30'

3
3

31-45'

5
1

46-60'

4
2

61-75'

2
3

76-90+'

4
Karviná
Brann
Karviná

Power Rating Breakdown

40.4

Overall

Attack 42.1
Defense 45.6
Form 31.6
Consistency 46.0
Brann

Power Rating Breakdown

45.1

Overall

Attack 58.5
Defense 49.2
Form 27.7
Consistency 46.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

58.0 vs 57.0

Opponent Quality

53.5 vs 55.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Karviná logo Karviná
W
Pardubice (62%)
L
Pardubice (57%)
L
Ml. Boleslav (61%)
W
Dukla (51%)
W
Liberec (43%)
L
Sparta Prague (59%)
D
Olomouc (51%)
L
Pardubice (57%)
Brann logo Brann
W
Fredrikstad (39%)
W
Tromsø (68%)
D
Rosenborg (46%)
L
Viking (70%)
L
Sandefjord (50%)
W
HamKam (55%)
L
Tromsø (63%)
L
Kristiansund (48%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Pardubice A
3 - 1 W
62%
Pardubice H
1 - 2 L
57%
Ml. Boleslav H
0 - 3 L
61%
Dukla A
2 - 1 W
51%
Liberec H
3 - 1 W
43%
Sparta Prague A
0 - 2 L
59%
Olomouc A
2 - 2 D
51%
Pardubice H
1 - 2 L
57%
Slovácko H
0 - 2 L
45%
Jablonec A
0 - 1 L
49%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Fredrikstad H
3 - 1 W
39%
Tromsø A
5 - 0 W
68%
Rosenborg A
1 - 1 D
46%
Viking A
2 - 3 L
70%
Sandefjord H
0 - 1 L
50%
HamKam A
5 - 1 W
55%
Tromsø H
1 - 2 L
63%
Kristiansund A
2 - 3 L
48%
Bologna A
0 - 1 L
61%
Bologna H
0 - 1 L
56%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Karviná has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 55.3) compared to Brann (SoS: 42.3). This means Karviná's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Brann holds the attacking edge with 1.9 goals per match versus Karviná's 1.2, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Brann has the defensive edge, conceding 1.4 per match compared to Karviná's 1.7.

Karviná has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.1 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Karviná

Karviná

VS
Brann

Brann

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more