Compare Karviná vs Gent

Karviná vs Gent Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Karviná vs Gent: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Karviná Home Team

Gent Away Team

Karviná

40.4

W L L W W L D L L L

Last 10 Matches

Gent

46.6

D L L D D L D W W W

Categories Won

Karviná

Draw

Gent

Performance Radar

Karviná

Gent

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

30%

3W, 1D, 6L

30%

3W, 4D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match

1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-5

Clean Sheet

0 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

70%

7 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

60%

6 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

Kahuan Vinícius (2 goals)

M. Dean (4 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 5

1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 4

Home Win Rate

20%

1W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate

40%

2W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

55.3

League Difficulty: 58.0, Opponent Quality: 53.5

53.6

League Difficulty: 59.5, Opponent Quality: 49.6

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.36

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: -0.16

0.82

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.28

Adjusted Power Rating

40.4

Attack: 42.1, Defense: 45.6, Form: 31.6

46.6

Attack: 38.0, Defense: 69.1, Form: 31.1

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Karviná

Gent

Power Rating Breakdown

40.4

Overall

Attack 42.1

Defense 45.6

Form 31.6

Consistency 46.0

Power Rating Breakdown

46.6

Overall

Attack 38.0

Defense 69.1

Form 31.1

Consistency 57.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

58.0 vs 59.5

Opponent Quality

53.5 vs 49.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Karviná

Gent

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Pardubice A

Czech First League

3 - 1 W

62%

Pardubice H

Czech First League

1 - 2 L

57%

Ml. Boleslav H

Czech First League

0 - 3 L

61%

Dukla A

Czech First League

2 - 1 W

51%

Liberec H

Czech First League

3 - 1 W

43%

Sparta Prague A

Czech First League

0 - 2 L

59%

Olomouc A

Czech First League

2 - 2 D

51%

Pardubice H

Czech First League

1 - 2 L

57%

Slovácko H

Czech First League

0 - 2 L

45%

Jablonec A

Czech First League

0 - 1 L

49%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Anderlecht H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 1 D

35%

Mechelen A

Belgian First Division A

0 - 1 L

34%

Club Brugge H

Belgian First Division A

0 - 2 L

66%

R. Union SG A

Belgian First Division A

0 - 0 D

69%

Sint-Truiden H

Belgian First Division A

0 - 0 D

44%

Anderlecht A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 3 L

52%

Mechelen H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 1 D

40%

Dender A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

3 - 1 W

51%

ZW H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 0 W

65%

Mechelen H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

3 - 1 W

40%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 55.3 vs 53.6), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Karviná averaging 1.2 and Gent averaging 1.1 goals per match.

Gent has the defensive edge, conceding 1.0 per match compared to Karviná's 1.7.

Karviná has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Gent has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.5 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Gent has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 6.2 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Karviná

Gent

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair