Skip to content
Compare Karviná vs NAC

Karviná vs NAC Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Karviná vs NAC: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Karviná Karviná Home Team
NAC NAC Away Team
Karviná
40.4
W L L W W L D L L L

Last 10 Matches

NAC
33.2
W L L D D L L D L W

Categories Won

10

Karviná

3

Draw

2

NAC

Performance Radar

Karviná
NAC

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 1D, 6L

20%

2W, 3D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-5

-5

-11

-11

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
Kahuan Vinícius (2 goals)
M. Nassoh (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 5
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 4
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
55.3

League Difficulty: 58.0, Opponent Quality: 53.5

53.8

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 62.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.36

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: -0.16

0.91

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.11

Adjusted Power Rating
40.4

Attack: 42.1, Defense: 45.6, Form: 31.6

33.2

Attack: 27.7, Defense: 38.1, Form: 20.8

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

1

16-30'

1
3

31-45'

2
1

46-60'

1
2

61-75'

2
3

76-90+'

2
Karviná
NAC
Karviná

Power Rating Breakdown

40.4

Overall

Attack 42.1
Defense 45.6
Form 31.6
Consistency 46.0
NAC

Power Rating Breakdown

33.2

Overall

Attack 27.7
Defense 38.1
Form 20.8
Consistency 61.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

58.0 vs 80.0

Opponent Quality

53.5 vs 62.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Karviná logo Karviná
W
Pardubice (62%)
L
Pardubice (57%)
L
Ml. Boleslav (61%)
W
Dukla (51%)
W
Liberec (43%)
L
Sparta Prague (59%)
D
Olomouc (51%)
L
Pardubice (57%)
NAC logo NAC
W
Heerenveen (67%)
L
Utrecht (75%)
L
Ajax (62%)
D
Fortuna (61%)
D
Sparta (44%)
L
Zwolle (59%)
L
Go Ahead (70%)
D
Feyenoord (67%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Pardubice A
3 - 1 W
62%
Pardubice H
1 - 2 L
57%
Ml. Boleslav H
0 - 3 L
61%
Dukla A
2 - 1 W
51%
Liberec H
3 - 1 W
43%
Sparta Prague A
0 - 2 L
59%
Olomouc A
2 - 2 D
51%
Pardubice H
1 - 2 L
57%
Slovácko H
0 - 2 L
45%
Jablonec A
0 - 1 L
49%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Heerenveen H
2 - 0 W
67%
Utrecht A
0 - 2 L
75%
Ajax H
0 - 2 L
62%
Fortuna A
1 - 1 D
61%
Sparta H
0 - 0 D
44%
Zwolle A
1 - 2 L
59%
Go Ahead A
0 - 6 L
70%
Feyenoord H
3 - 3 D
67%
Telstar A
0 - 3 L
69%
Volendam H
1 - 0 W
49%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 55.3 vs 53.8), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Karviná holds the attacking edge with 1.2 goals per match versus NAC's 0.8, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Karviná conceding 1.7 and NAC conceding 1.9 per match.

Karviná has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Karviná has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 7.2 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Karviná

Karviná

VS
NAC

NAC

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more