Compare Karviná vs Standard

Karviná vs Standard Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Karviná vs Standard: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Karviná Home Team

Standard Away Team

Karviná

40.4

W L L W W L D L L L

Last 10 Matches

Standard

65.8

W W D L W L W D D W

Categories Won

Karviná

Draw

Standard

Performance Radar

Karviná

Standard

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

30%

3W, 1D, 6L

50%

5W, 3D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match

1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.7

17 / 10 matches

0.9

9 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-5

Clean Sheet

0 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

70%

7 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

60%

6 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

Kahuan Vinícius (2 goals)

C. Nielsen (3 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 5

1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 14

Home Win Rate

20%

1W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate

40%

2W / 5 matches

67%

4W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

55.3

League Difficulty: 58.0, Opponent Quality: 53.5

66.9

League Difficulty: 59.5, Opponent Quality: 51.8

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 0 matches

100%

1W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.36

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: -0.16

1.77

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.07

Adjusted Power Rating

40.4

Attack: 42.1, Defense: 45.6, Form: 31.6

65.8

Attack: 66.2, Defense: 81.8, Form: 58.5

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Karviná

Standard

Power Rating Breakdown

40.4

Overall

Attack 42.1

Defense 45.6

Form 31.6

Consistency 46.0

Power Rating Breakdown

65.8

Overall

Attack 66.2

Defense 81.8

Form 58.5

Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

58.0 vs 59.5

Opponent Quality

53.5 vs 51.8

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 100%

Karviná

Standard

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Pardubice A

Czech First League

3 - 1 W

62%

Pardubice H

Czech First League

1 - 2 L

57%

Ml. Boleslav H

Czech First League

0 - 3 L

61%

Dukla A

Czech First League

2 - 1 W

51%

Liberec H

Czech First League

3 - 1 W

43%

Sparta Prague A

Czech First League

0 - 2 L

59%

Olomouc A

Czech First League

2 - 2 D

51%

Pardubice H

Czech First League

1 - 2 L

57%

Slovácko H

Czech First League

0 - 2 L

45%

Jablonec A

Czech First League

0 - 1 L

49%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

OHL H

Belgian First Division A

2 - 1 W

35%

Antwerp A

Belgian First Division A

5 - 0 W

45%

Genk A

Belgian First Division A

1 - 1 D

54%

Antwerp H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 2 L

40%

Charleroi A

Belgian First Division A

2 - 1 W

51%

Westerlo H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 2 L

57%

OHL A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

3 - 1 W

52%

Westerlo H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 0 D

57%

Antwerp A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 1 D

57%

ZW A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 0 W

70%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Standard has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 66.9) compared to Karviná (SoS: 55.3). This means Standard's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Standard holds the attacking edge with 1.7 goals per match versus Karviná's 1.2, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Standard has the defensive edge, conceding 0.9 per match compared to Karviná's 1.7.

Karviná has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Standard is a strong road team with a 67% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Standard emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (65.8 vs 40.4) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Karviná

Standard

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair