Skip to content
Compare Karviná vs ZW

Karviná vs ZW Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Karviná vs ZW: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Karviná Karviná Home Team
ZW ZW Away Team
Karviná
40.4
W L L W W L D L L L

Last 10 Matches

ZW
60.1
W W W W W D W L L L

Categories Won

2

Karviná

2

Draw

11

ZW

Performance Radar

Karviná
ZW

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 1D, 6L

60%

6W, 1D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-5

-5

+6

+6

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
Kahuan Vinícius (2 goals)
J. Opoku (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 5
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 11
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
55.3

League Difficulty: 58.0, Opponent Quality: 53.5

55.4

League Difficulty: 62.4, Opponent Quality: 50.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.36

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: -0.16

1.84

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.14

Adjusted Power Rating
40.4

Attack: 42.1, Defense: 45.6, Form: 31.6

60.1

Attack: 59.7, Defense: 66.8, Form: 63.2

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

1
1

16-30'

2
3

31-45'

2
1

46-60'

4
2

61-75'

5
3

76-90+'

3
Karviná
ZW
Karviná

Power Rating Breakdown

40.4

Overall

Attack 42.1
Defense 45.6
Form 31.6
Consistency 46.0
ZW

Power Rating Breakdown

60.1

Overall

Attack 59.7
Defense 66.8
Form 63.2
Consistency 43.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

58.0 vs 62.4

Opponent Quality

53.5 vs 50.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Karviná logo Karviná
W
Pardubice (62%)
L
Pardubice (57%)
L
Ml. Boleslav (61%)
W
Dukla (51%)
W
Liberec (43%)
L
Sparta Prague (59%)
D
Olomouc (51%)
L
Pardubice (57%)
ZW logo ZW
W
Dender (35%)
W
Cercle Brugge (51%)
W
La Louvière (38%)
W
La Louvière (42%)
W
Dender (51%)
D
Cercle Brugge (58%)
W
Charleroi (57%)
L
Gent (63%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Pardubice A
3 - 1 W
62%
Pardubice H
1 - 2 L
57%
Ml. Boleslav H
0 - 3 L
61%
Dukla A
2 - 1 W
51%
Liberec H
3 - 1 W
43%
Sparta Prague A
0 - 2 L
59%
Olomouc A
2 - 2 D
51%
Pardubice H
1 - 2 L
57%
Slovácko H
0 - 2 L
45%
Jablonec A
0 - 1 L
49%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Dender H
2 - 1 W
35%
Cercle Brugge A
3 - 2 W
51%
La Louvière H
4 - 0 W
38%
La Louvière A
2 - 0 W
42%
Dender A
2 - 1 W
51%
Cercle Brugge H
2 - 2 D
58%
Charleroi H
1 - 0 W
57%
Gent A
0 - 2 L
63%
Standard H
0 - 1 L
67%
Mechelen A
1 - 2 L
45%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 55.3 vs 55.4), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

ZW holds the attacking edge with 1.7 goals per match versus Karviná's 1.2, though the gap is not insurmountable.

ZW has the defensive edge, conceding 1.1 per match compared to Karviná's 1.7.

Karviná has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

ZW has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

ZW is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

ZW emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (60.1 vs 40.4) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Karviná

Karviná

VS
ZW

ZW

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more