Compare Kasımpaşa vs Antwerp

Kasımpaşa vs Antwerp Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Kasımpaşa vs Antwerp: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Kasımpaşa Home Team

Antwerp Away Team

Kasımpaşa

39.5

L D L W D W L W D L

Last 10 Matches

Antwerp

41.9

L L W W W L L L D D

Categories Won

Kasımpaşa

Draw

Antwerp

Performance Radar

Kasımpaşa

Antwerp

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

30%

3W, 3D, 4L

30%

3W, 2D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match

1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-5

-4

Clean Sheet

30%

3 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

A. Benedyczak (8 goals)

C. Scott (4 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 5

1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 8

Home Win Rate

60%

3W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

0W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

48.9

League Difficulty: 72.0, Opponent Quality: 57.4

56.3

League Difficulty: 59.5, Opponent Quality: 54.2

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 1 matches

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.3

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: -0.1

1.15

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: -0.05

Adjusted Power Rating

39.5

Attack: 39.6, Defense: 42.9, Form: 29.7

41.9

Attack: 39.0, Defense: 53.1, Form: 31.9

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Kasımpaşa

Antwerp

Power Rating Breakdown

39.5

Overall

Attack 39.6

Defense 42.9

Form 29.7

Consistency 53.2

Power Rating Breakdown

41.9

Overall

Attack 39.0

Defense 53.1

Form 31.9

Consistency 49.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

72.0 vs 59.5

Opponent Quality

57.4 vs 54.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Kasımpaşa

Antwerp

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Gençlerbirliği A

Turkish Super Lig

2 - 3 L

50%

Kocaelispor H

Turkish Super Lig

1 - 1 D

46%

Başakşehir A

Turkish Super Lig

0 - 4 L

71%

Alanyaspor H

Turkish Super Lig

1 - 0 W

56%

Göztepe A

Turkish Super Lig

3 - 3 D

64%

Kayseri H

Turkish Super Lig

2 - 0 W

44%

Beşiktaş A

Turkish Super Lig

1 - 2 L

65%

Eyüp H

Turkish Super Lig

1 - 0 W

53%

Konyaspor A

Turkish Super Lig

1 - 1 D

66%

Rize H

Turkish Super Lig

0 - 3 L

59%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Charleroi H

Belgian First Division A

0 - 1 L

46%

Standard H

Belgian First Division A

0 - 5 L

55%

Westerlo A

Belgian First Division A

4 - 2 W

50%

Standard A

Belgian First Division A

2 - 1 W

60%

OHL H

Belgian First Division A

2 - 0 W

35%

Charleroi A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 2 L

62%

Genk H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 2 L

61%

OHL A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 1 L

52%

Standard H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 1 D

67%

La Louvière A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 0 D

54%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 48.9 vs 56.3), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Kasımpaşa averaging 1.2 and Antwerp averaging 1.1 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with Kasımpaşa conceding 1.7 and Antwerp conceding 1.5 per match.

Antwerp has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by the day's form, tactical adjustments, and perhaps a moment of individual brilliance.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Kasımpaşa

Antwerp

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair