Skip to content
Compare Kasımpaşa vs Genk

Kasımpaşa vs Genk Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Kasımpaşa vs Genk: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Kasımpaşa Kasımpaşa Home Team
Genk Genk Away Team
Kasımpaşa
39.5
L D L W D W L W D L

Last 10 Matches

Genk
50.6
W L D D W D W D L W

Categories Won

2

Kasımpaşa

4

Draw

9

Genk

Performance Radar

Kasımpaşa
Genk

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 3D, 4L

40%

4W, 4D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-5

-5

0

0

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
A. Benedyczak (8 goals)
A. Bibout (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 5
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
48.9

League Difficulty: 72.0, Opponent Quality: 57.4

56.0

League Difficulty: 60.6, Opponent Quality: 52.9

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.3

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: -0.1

1.53

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.07

Adjusted Power Rating
39.5

Attack: 39.6, Defense: 42.9, Form: 29.7

50.6

Attack: 56.5, Defense: 49.5, Form: 42.4

Goal Timing Analysis

4

0-15'

2

16-30'

1
2

31-45'

1
4

46-60'

4
1

61-75'

5
1

76-90+'

3
Kasımpaşa
Genk
Kasımpaşa

Power Rating Breakdown

39.5

Overall

Attack 39.6
Defense 42.9
Form 29.7
Consistency 53.2
Genk

Power Rating Breakdown

50.6

Overall

Attack 56.5
Defense 49.5
Form 42.4
Consistency 56.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

72.0 vs 60.6

Opponent Quality

57.4 vs 52.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Kasımpaşa logo Kasımpaşa
L
Gençlerbirliği (50%)
D
Kocaelispor (46%)
L
Başakşehir (71%)
W
Alanyaspor (56%)
D
Göztepe (64%)
W
Kayseri (44%)
L
Beşiktaş (65%)
W
Eyüp (53%)
Genk logo Genk
W
Westerlo (45%)
L
Charleroi (51%)
D
Standard (55%)
D
Charleroi (46%)
W
Westerlo (50%)
D
OHL (47%)
W
Antwerp (57%)
D
La Louvière (54%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Gençlerbirliği A
2 - 3 L
50%
Kocaelispor H
1 - 1 D
46%
Başakşehir A
0 - 4 L
71%
Alanyaspor H
1 - 0 W
56%
Göztepe A
3 - 3 D
64%
Kayseri H
2 - 0 W
44%
Beşiktaş A
1 - 2 L
65%
Eyüp H
1 - 0 W
53%
Konyaspor A
1 - 1 D
66%
Rize H
0 - 3 L
59%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Westerlo H
3 - 0 W
45%
Charleroi A
0 - 2 L
51%
Standard H
1 - 1 D
55%
Charleroi H
1 - 1 D
46%
Westerlo A
2 - 1 W
50%
OHL H
0 - 0 D
47%
Antwerp A
2 - 1 W
57%
La Louvière A
5 - 5 D
54%
Freiburg A
1 - 5 L
69%
Sint-Truiden H
1 - 0 W
55%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 48.9 vs 56.0), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Genk holds the attacking edge with 1.6 goals per match versus Kasımpaşa's 1.2, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Kasımpaşa conceding 1.7 and Genk conceding 1.6 per match.

Genk has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Genk has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 11.1 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Kasımpaşa

Kasımpaşa

VS
Genk

Genk

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more