Skip to content
Compare Kasımpaşa vs Napredak

Kasımpaşa vs Napredak Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Kasımpaşa vs Napredak: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Kasımpaşa Kasımpaşa Home Team
Napredak Napredak Away Team
Kasımpaşa
39.5
L D L W D W L W D L

Last 10 Matches

Napredak
25.8
W L L L L L L L D L

Categories Won

11

Kasımpaşa

2

Draw

2

Napredak

Performance Radar

Kasımpaşa
Napredak

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 3D, 4L

10%

1W, 1D, 8L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

2.4

24 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-5

-5

-16

-16

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
A. Benedyczak (8 goals)
N. Bogdanovski (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 5
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
48.9

League Difficulty: 72.0, Opponent Quality: 57.4

41.4

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 55.5

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.3

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: -0.1

0.82

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.02

Adjusted Power Rating
39.5

Attack: 39.6, Defense: 42.9, Form: 29.7

25.8

Attack: 24.4, Defense: 18.3, Form: 9.1

Goal Timing Analysis

4

0-15'

1

16-30'

2

31-45'

1
4

46-60'

2
1

61-75'

1
1

76-90+'

3
Kasımpaşa
Napredak
Kasımpaşa

Power Rating Breakdown

39.5

Overall

Attack 39.6
Defense 42.9
Form 29.7
Consistency 53.2
Napredak

Power Rating Breakdown

25.8

Overall

Attack 24.4
Defense 18.3
Form 9.1
Consistency 74.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

72.0 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

57.4 vs 55.5

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Kasımpaşa logo Kasımpaşa
L
Gençlerbirliği (50%)
D
Kocaelispor (46%)
L
Başakşehir (71%)
W
Alanyaspor (56%)
D
Göztepe (64%)
W
Kayseri (44%)
L
Beşiktaş (65%)
W
Eyüp (53%)
Napredak logo Napredak
W
Spartak (33%)
L
Radnički Niš (44%)
L
Javor (56%)
L
FK IMT (58%)
L
TSC (60%)
L
Mladost Lučani (53%)
L
TSC (56%)
L
Vojvodina (68%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Gençlerbirliği A
2 - 3 L
50%
Kocaelispor H
1 - 1 D
46%
Başakşehir A
0 - 4 L
71%
Alanyaspor H
1 - 0 W
56%
Göztepe A
3 - 3 D
64%
Kayseri H
2 - 0 W
44%
Beşiktaş A
1 - 2 L
65%
Eyüp H
1 - 0 W
53%
Konyaspor A
1 - 1 D
66%
Rize H
0 - 3 L
59%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Spartak A
3 - 0 W
33%
Radnički Niš H
0 - 1 L
44%
Javor A
0 - 4 L
56%
FK IMT H
0 - 1 L
58%
TSC A
1 - 4 L
60%
Mladost Lučani A
0 - 2 L
53%
TSC H
1 - 2 L
56%
Vojvodina A
1 - 4 L
68%
OFK H
2 - 2 D
53%
Red Star A
0 - 4 L
74%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 48.9 vs 41.4), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Kasımpaşa holds the attacking edge with 1.2 goals per match versus Napredak's 0.8, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Kasımpaşa has the defensive edge, conceding 1.7 per match compared to Napredak's 2.4.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Kasımpaşa has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 13.7 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Kasımpaşa

Kasımpaşa

VS
Napredak

Napredak

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more