Skip to content
Compare Kolos vs Standard

Kolos vs Standard Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Kolos vs Standard: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Kolos Kolos Home Team
Standard Standard Away Team
Kolos
69.0
W W W W D D W D L W

Last 10 Matches

Standard
65.8
W W D L W L W D D W

Categories Won

6

Kolos

2

Draw

7

Standard

Performance Radar

Kolos
Standard

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
60%

6W, 3D, 1L

50%

5W, 3D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
0.6

6 / 10 matches

0.9

9 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+5

+5

+8

+8

Clean Sheet
70%

7 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
20%

2 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
20%

2 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
A. Salabai (3 goals)
C. Nielsen (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 14
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

67%

4W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
72.1

League Difficulty: 98.0, Opponent Quality: 65.3

66.9

League Difficulty: 59.5, Opponent Quality: 51.8

Elite Opponent Record
40%

2W / 5 matches

100%

1W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.53

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: -0.43

1.77

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.07

Adjusted Power Rating
69.0

Attack: 44.8, Defense: 97.7, Form: 73.3

65.8

Attack: 66.2, Defense: 81.8, Form: 58.5

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

2

16-30'

1

31-45'

3
1

46-60'

2
2

61-75'

4
4

76-90+'

8
Kolos
Standard
Kolos

Power Rating Breakdown

69.0

Overall

Attack 44.8
Defense 97.7
Form 73.3
Consistency 61.3
Standard

Power Rating Breakdown

65.8

Overall

Attack 66.2
Defense 81.8
Form 58.5
Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

98.0 vs 59.5

Opponent Quality

65.3 vs 51.8

Elite Opponent Record

40% vs 100%
Kolos logo Kolos
W
Kudrivka (55%)
W
Oleksandria (49%)
W
SK Poltava (45%)
W
LNZ Cherkasy (74%)
D
Rukh Vynnyky (49%)
D
Metalist 1925 (74%)
W
Veres Rivne (67%)
D
Zorya (75%)
Standard logo Standard
W
OHL (35%)
W
Antwerp (45%)
D
Genk (54%)
L
Antwerp (40%)
W
Charleroi (51%)
L
Westerlo (57%)
W
OHL (52%)
D
Westerlo (57%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Kudrivka H
1 - 0 W
55%
Oleksandria A
3 - 0 W
49%
SK Poltava H
2 - 0 W
45%
LNZ Cherkasy H
1 - 0 W
74%
Rukh Vynnyky A
1 - 1 D
49%
Metalist 1925 H
0 - 0 D
74%
Veres Rivne A
1 - 0 W
67%
Zorya H
1 - 1 D
75%
Epitsentr A
0 - 4 L
79%
Karpaty Lviv A
1 - 0 W
86%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
OHL H
2 - 1 W
35%
Antwerp A
5 - 0 W
45%
Genk A
1 - 1 D
54%
Antwerp H
1 - 2 L
40%
Charleroi A
2 - 1 W
51%
Westerlo H
1 - 2 L
57%
OHL A
3 - 1 W
52%
Westerlo H
0 - 0 D
57%
Antwerp A
1 - 1 D
57%
ZW A
1 - 0 W
70%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 72.1 vs 66.9), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Standard holds the attacking edge with 1.7 goals per match versus Kolos's 1.1, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Kolos has the defensive edge, conceding 0.6 per match compared to Standard's 0.9.

Kolos has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 2 of 5 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Standard is a strong road team with a 67% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.2 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Kolos

Kolos

VS
Standard

Standard

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more