Skip to content
Compare Kryvbas KR vs Brann

Kryvbas KR vs Brann Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Kryvbas KR vs Brann: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Kryvbas KR Kryvbas KR Home Team
Brann Brann Away Team
Kryvbas KR
61.9
W W D L W W L W L D

Last 10 Matches

Brann
45.1
W W D L L W L L L L

Categories Won

9

Kryvbas KR

3

Draw

3

Brann

Performance Radar

Kryvbas KR
Brann

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 2D, 3L

30%

3W, 1D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+2

+2

+5

+5

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
G. Mendoza (4 goals)
K. Ingason (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 13 / 2nd Half: 6
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
72.8

League Difficulty: 98.0, Opponent Quality: 67.3

42.3

League Difficulty: 57.0, Opponent Quality: 55.6

Elite Opponent Record
40%

2W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.78

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.88

2.14

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.24

Adjusted Power Rating
61.9

Attack: 77.8, Defense: 53.2, Form: 61.4

45.1

Attack: 58.5, Defense: 49.2, Form: 27.7

Goal Timing Analysis

4

0-15'

1
3

16-30'

3
4

31-45'

5
3

46-60'

4
3

61-75'

2
2

76-90+'

4
Kryvbas KR
Brann
Kryvbas KR

Power Rating Breakdown

61.9

Overall

Attack 77.8
Defense 53.2
Form 61.4
Consistency 45.7
Brann

Power Rating Breakdown

45.1

Overall

Attack 58.5
Defense 49.2
Form 27.7
Consistency 46.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

98.0 vs 57.0

Opponent Quality

67.3 vs 55.6

Elite Opponent Record

40% vs 0%
Kryvbas KR logo Kryvbas KR
W
Veres Rivne (67%)
W
Karpaty Lviv (81%)
D
SK Poltava (50%)
L
Dynamo Kyiv (78%)
W
Rukh Vynnyky (44%)
W
Kudrivka (60%)
L
LNZ Cherkasy (74%)
W
Epitsentr (74%)
Brann logo Brann
W
Fredrikstad (39%)
W
Tromsø (68%)
D
Rosenborg (46%)
L
Viking (70%)
L
Sandefjord (50%)
W
HamKam (55%)
L
Tromsø (63%)
L
Kristiansund (48%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Veres Rivne A
3 - 1 W
67%
Karpaty Lviv H
1 - 0 W
81%
SK Poltava A
3 - 3 D
50%
Dynamo Kyiv H
5 - 6 L
78%
Rukh Vynnyky H
3 - 0 W
44%
Kudrivka A
2 - 1 W
60%
LNZ Cherkasy H
0 - 3 L
74%
Epitsentr H
2 - 1 W
74%
Polissya A
0 - 2 L
82%
Obolon A
0 - 0 D
63%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Fredrikstad H
3 - 1 W
39%
Tromsø A
5 - 0 W
68%
Rosenborg A
1 - 1 D
46%
Viking A
2 - 3 L
70%
Sandefjord H
0 - 1 L
50%
HamKam A
5 - 1 W
55%
Tromsø H
1 - 2 L
63%
Kristiansund A
2 - 3 L
48%
Bologna A
0 - 1 L
61%
Bologna H
0 - 1 L
56%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Kryvbas KR has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 72.8) compared to Brann (SoS: 42.3). This means Kryvbas KR's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Kryvbas KR averaging 1.9 and Brann averaging 1.9 goals per match.

Brann has the defensive edge, conceding 1.4 per match compared to Kryvbas KR's 1.7.

Kryvbas KR has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 2 of 5 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.5 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Kryvbas KR emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (61.9 vs 45.1) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Kryvbas KR

Kryvbas KR

VS
Brann

Brann

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more