Skip to content
Compare Kudrivka vs GC Zürich

Kudrivka vs GC Zürich Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Kudrivka vs GC Zürich: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Kudrivka Kudrivka Home Team
GC Zürich GC Zürich Away Team
Kudrivka
38.7
L D L L L L L D D W

Last 10 Matches

GC Zürich
27.9
W L L L W L L L L L

Categories Won

5

Kudrivka

2

Draw

8

GC Zürich

Performance Radar

Kudrivka
GC Zürich

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
10%

1W, 3D, 6L

20%

2W, 0D, 8L

Goals Scored / Match
0.6

6 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

2.6

26 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-6

-6

-16

-16

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
20%

2 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
O. Kozak (2 goals)
D. Abels (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 0 / 2nd Half: 6
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 5
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
17%

1W / 6 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
64.7

League Difficulty: 98.0, Opponent Quality: 72.8

50.4

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 51.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 7 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.73

Actual: 0.6 | Diff: -0.13

1.0

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: 0.0

Adjusted Power Rating
38.7

Attack: 22.9, Defense: 68.8, Form: 11.5

27.9

Attack: 33.5, Defense: 13.4, Form: 20.1

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

1

16-30'

2

31-45'

2
1

46-60'

1
2

61-75'

3
3

76-90+'

1
Kudrivka
GC Zürich
Kudrivka

Power Rating Breakdown

38.7

Overall

Attack 22.9
Defense 68.8
Form 11.5
Consistency 74.8
GC Zürich

Power Rating Breakdown

27.9

Overall

Attack 33.5
Defense 13.4
Form 20.1
Consistency 56.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

98.0 vs 49.0

Opponent Quality

72.8 vs 51.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Kudrivka logo Kudrivka
L
Kolos (83%)
D
Obolon (63%)
L
Shakhtar D (78%)
L
Metalist 1925 (79%)
L
Kryvbas KR (71%)
L
Epitsentr (79%)
L
Polissya (77%)
D
Veres Rivne (62%)
GC Zürich logo GC Zürich
W
Winterthur (42%)
L
Zürich (42%)
L
Servette (65%)
L
Luzern (56%)
W
Winterthur (42%)
L
Sion (62%)
L
Servette (66%)
L
Thun (49%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Kolos A
0 - 1 L
83%
Obolon A
1 - 1 D
63%
Shakhtar D H
1 - 3 L
78%
Metalist 1925 A
0 - 1 L
79%
Kryvbas KR H
1 - 2 L
71%
Epitsentr A
0 - 1 L
79%
Polissya H
0 - 2 L
77%
Veres Rivne H
0 - 0 D
62%
Karpaty Lviv A
1 - 1 D
86%
SK Poltava A
2 - 0 W
50%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Winterthur H
3 - 2 W
42%
Zürich A
1 - 2 L
42%
Servette H
0 - 2 L
65%
Luzern H
1 - 2 L
56%
Winterthur A
2 - 0 W
42%
Sion H
0 - 4 L
62%
Servette A
0 - 5 L
66%
Thun A
1 - 5 L
49%
Lausanne H
2 - 3 L
38%
Basel A
0 - 1 L
51%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Kudrivka has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 64.7) compared to GC Zürich (SoS: 50.4). This means Kudrivka's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

GC Zürich holds the attacking edge with 1.0 goals per match versus Kudrivka's 0.6, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Defensively, Kudrivka is far superior, conceding just 1.2 goals per match with 2 clean sheets, while GC Zürich leaks 2.6 per match.

Kudrivka has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 7 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

GC Zürich has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.7 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Kudrivka has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 10.8 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Kudrivka

Kudrivka

VS
GC Zürich

GC Zürich

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more