Skip to content
Compare KuPS vs Cercle Brugge

KuPS vs Cercle Brugge Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare KuPS vs Cercle Brugge: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

KuPS KuPS Home Team
Cercle Brugge Cercle Brugge Away Team
KuPS
40.4
D L D W D W W L L D

Last 10 Matches

Cercle Brugge
44.6
L L W W W D W L L D

Categories Won

1

KuPS

5

Draw

9

Cercle Brugge

Performance Radar

KuPS
Cercle Brugge

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 4D, 3L

40%

4W, 2D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-1

-1

+1

+1

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
30%

3 / 10 matches

90%

9 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
J. Moreno (4 goals)
O. Diakité (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
40.8

League Difficulty: 54.9, Opponent Quality: 53.9

42.4

League Difficulty: 62.4, Opponent Quality: 49.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.05

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.05

2.0

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.1

Adjusted Power Rating
40.4

Attack: 33.3, Defense: 54.5, Form: 27.2

44.6

Attack: 58.5, Defense: 37.0, Form: 37.0

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

3

16-30'

4
1

31-45'

2
4

46-60'

4

61-75'

4
3

76-90+'

2
KuPS
Cercle Brugge
KuPS

Power Rating Breakdown

40.4

Overall

Attack 33.3
Defense 54.5
Form 27.2
Consistency 57.7
Cercle Brugge

Power Rating Breakdown

44.6

Overall

Attack 58.5
Defense 37.0
Form 37.0
Consistency 44.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

54.9 vs 62.4

Opponent Quality

53.9 vs 49.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
KuPS logo KuPS
D
SJK (43%)
L
Oulu (53%)
D
HJK (50%)
W
Oulu (50%)
D
Jaro (44%)
W
Gnistan (39%)
W
Ilves (43%)
L
Lech (77%)
Cercle Brugge logo Cercle Brugge
L
La Louvière (42%)
L
ZW (54%)
W
Dender (35%)
W
Dender (40%)
W
La Louvière (49%)
D
ZW (70%)
W
Anderlecht (52%)
L
La Louvière (49%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
SJK H
0 - 0 D
43%
Oulu A
0 - 2 L
53%
HJK H
1 - 1 D
50%
Oulu H
3 - 2 W
50%
Jaro A
1 - 1 D
44%
Gnistan H
1 - 0 W
39%
Ilves A
3 - 1 W
43%
Lech A
0 - 1 L
77%
Lech H
0 - 2 L
72%
Crystal Palace A
2 - 2 D
68%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
La Louvière A
1 - 4 L
42%
ZW H
2 - 3 L
54%
Dender H
2 - 1 W
35%
Dender A
4 - 1 W
40%
La Louvière H
3 - 0 W
49%
ZW A
2 - 2 D
70%
Anderlecht A
3 - 2 W
52%
La Louvière H
1 - 3 L
49%
Sint-Truiden A
1 - 2 L
60%
Dender H
0 - 0 D
46%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 40.8 vs 42.4), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Cercle Brugge holds the attacking edge with 1.9 goals per match versus KuPS's 1.1, though the gap is not insurmountable.

KuPS has the defensive edge, conceding 1.2 per match compared to Cercle Brugge's 1.8.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

KuPS

KuPS

VS
Cercle Brugge

Cercle Brugge

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more