Compare KuPS vs Fortuna

KuPS vs Fortuna Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare KuPS vs Fortuna: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

KuPS Home Team

Fortuna Away Team

KuPS

40.4

D L D W D W W L L D

Last 10 Matches

Fortuna

43.6

W L L D L L W L W W

Categories Won

KuPS

Draw

Fortuna

Performance Radar

KuPS

Fortuna

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

30%

3W, 4D, 3L

40%

4W, 1D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match

1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-1

-4

Clean Sheet

20%

2 / 10 matches

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

30%

3 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

50%

5 / 10 matches

90%

9 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

J. Moreno (4 goals)

K. Sierhuis (4 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 7

1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 7

Home Win Rate

40%

2W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate

20%

1W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

40.8

League Difficulty: 54.9, Opponent Quality: 53.9

54.1

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 63.1

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 2 matches

0W / 3 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.05

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.05

1.77

Actual: 1.5 | Diff: -0.27

Adjusted Power Rating

40.4

Attack: 33.3, Defense: 54.5, Form: 27.2

43.6

Attack: 52.0, Defense: 38.2, Form: 41.6

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

KuPS

Fortuna

Power Rating Breakdown

40.4

Overall

Attack 33.3

Defense 54.5

Form 27.2

Consistency 57.7

Power Rating Breakdown

43.6

Overall

Attack 52.0

Defense 38.2

Form 41.6

Consistency 39.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

54.9 vs 80.0

Opponent Quality

53.9 vs 63.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

KuPS

Fortuna

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

SJK H

Finnish Veikkausliiga

0 - 0 D

43%

Oulu A

Finnish Veikkausliiga

0 - 2 L

53%

HJK H

Finnish Veikkausliiga

1 - 1 D

50%

Oulu H

Finnish Veikkausliiga

3 - 2 W

50%

Jaro A

Finnish Veikkausliiga

1 - 1 D

44%

Gnistan H

Finnish Veikkausliiga

1 - 0 W

39%

Ilves A

Finnish Veikkausliiga

3 - 1 W

43%

Lech A

UEFA Conference League

0 - 1 L

77%

Lech H

UEFA Conference League

0 - 2 L

72%

Crystal Palace A

UEFA Conference League

2 - 2 D

68%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Zwolle H

Dutch Eredivisie

3 - 2 W

54%

Feyenoord H

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 2 L

67%

Heerenveen A

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 2 L

72%

NAC H

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 1 D

49%

AZ A

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 2 L

72%

Twente H

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 2 L

76%

Volendam A

Dutch Eredivisie

2 - 1 W

54%

Telstar H

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 4 L

64%

NEC A

Dutch Eredivisie

3 - 2 W

69%

Excelsior H

Dutch Eredivisie

2 - 1 W

54%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Fortuna has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 54.1) compared to KuPS (SoS: 40.8). This means Fortuna's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Fortuna holds the attacking edge with 1.5 goals per match versus KuPS's 1.1, though the gap is not insurmountable.

KuPS has the defensive edge, conceding 1.2 per match compared to Fortuna's 1.9.

Fortuna has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

KuPS

Fortuna

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair