Compare KuPS vs Go Ahead

KuPS vs Go Ahead Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare KuPS vs Go Ahead: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

KuPS Home Team

Go Ahead Away Team

KuPS

40.4

D L D W D W W L L D

Last 10 Matches

Go Ahead

56.1

L D D D W L W L W W

Categories Won

KuPS

Draw

Go Ahead

Performance Radar

KuPS

Go Ahead

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

30%

3W, 4D, 3L

40%

4W, 3D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match

1.1

11 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-1

Clean Sheet

20%

2 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

30%

3 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

50%

5 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

J. Moreno (4 goals)

J. Breum (5 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 7

1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 12

Home Win Rate

40%

2W / 5 matches

50%

3W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate

20%

1W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

40.8

League Difficulty: 54.9, Opponent Quality: 53.9

53.2

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 60.7

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 2 matches

0W / 3 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.05

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.05

2.0

Actual: 2.0 | Diff: 0.0

Adjusted Power Rating

40.4

Attack: 33.3, Defense: 54.5, Form: 27.2

56.1

Attack: 68.8, Defense: 61.9, Form: 41.3

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

KuPS

Go Ahead

Power Rating Breakdown

40.4

Overall

Attack 33.3

Defense 54.5

Form 27.2

Consistency 57.7

Power Rating Breakdown

56.1

Overall

Attack 68.8

Defense 61.9

Form 41.3

Consistency 50.5

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

54.9 vs 80.0

Opponent Quality

53.9 vs 60.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

KuPS

Go Ahead

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

SJK H

Finnish Veikkausliiga

0 - 0 D

43%

Oulu A

Finnish Veikkausliiga

0 - 2 L

53%

HJK H

Finnish Veikkausliiga

1 - 1 D

50%

Oulu H

Finnish Veikkausliiga

3 - 2 W

50%

Jaro A

Finnish Veikkausliiga

1 - 1 D

44%

Gnistan H

Finnish Veikkausliiga

1 - 0 W

39%

Ilves A

Finnish Veikkausliiga

3 - 1 W

43%

Lech A

UEFA Conference League

0 - 1 L

77%

Lech H

UEFA Conference League

0 - 2 L

72%

Crystal Palace A

UEFA Conference League

2 - 2 D

68%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

PSV H

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 4 L

75%

Sparta A

Dutch Eredivisie

2 - 2 D

49%

AZ H

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 0 D

67%

Groningen A

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 0 D

66%

Zwolle H

Dutch Eredivisie

5 - 0 W

54%

Utrecht A

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 2 L

75%

NAC H

Dutch Eredivisie

6 - 0 W

49%

Twente H

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 4 L

76%

Excelsior A

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 0 W

60%

Heracles H

Dutch Eredivisie

4 - 0 W

36%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Go Ahead has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 53.2) compared to KuPS (SoS: 40.8). This means Go Ahead's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Go Ahead holds the attacking edge with 2.0 goals per match versus KuPS's 1.1, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with KuPS conceding 1.2 and Go Ahead conceding 1.2 per match.

Go Ahead has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Go Ahead emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (56.1 vs 40.4) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

KuPS

Go Ahead

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair