Skip to content
Compare KuPS vs Górnik

KuPS vs Górnik Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare KuPS vs Górnik: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

KuPS KuPS Home Team
Górnik Górnik Away Team
KuPS
40.4
D L D W D W W L L D

Last 10 Matches

Górnik
50.0
L W W D W D W D L L

Categories Won

2

KuPS

4

Draw

9

Górnik

Performance Radar

KuPS
Górnik

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 4D, 3L

40%

4W, 3D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

0.9

9 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-1

-1

+2

+2

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
30%

3 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
J. Moreno (4 goals)
R. Janicki (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 7
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
40.8

League Difficulty: 54.9, Opponent Quality: 53.9

54.8

League Difficulty: 57.0, Opponent Quality: 53.4

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.05

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.05

1.14

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: -0.04

Adjusted Power Rating
40.4

Attack: 33.3, Defense: 54.5, Form: 27.2

50.0

Attack: 38.4, Defense: 73.4, Form: 41.9

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

1

16-30'

1
1

31-45'

2
4

46-60'

61-75'

2
3

76-90+'

5
KuPS
Górnik
KuPS

Power Rating Breakdown

40.4

Overall

Attack 33.3
Defense 54.5
Form 27.2
Consistency 57.7
Górnik

Power Rating Breakdown

50.0

Overall

Attack 38.4
Defense 73.4
Form 41.9
Consistency 50.5

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

54.9 vs 57.0

Opponent Quality

53.9 vs 53.4

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
KuPS logo KuPS
D
SJK (43%)
L
Oulu (53%)
D
HJK (50%)
W
Oulu (50%)
D
Jaro (44%)
W
Gnistan (39%)
W
Ilves (43%)
L
Lech (77%)
Górnik logo Górnik
L
Zagłębie (49%)
W
Jagiellonia (53%)
W
Kielce (43%)
D
Legia (64%)
W
Cracovia (40%)
D
Widzew (59%)
W
Raków (54%)
D
Motor (59%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
SJK H
0 - 0 D
43%
Oulu A
0 - 2 L
53%
HJK H
1 - 1 D
50%
Oulu H
3 - 2 W
50%
Jaro A
1 - 1 D
44%
Gnistan H
1 - 0 W
39%
Ilves A
3 - 1 W
43%
Lech A
0 - 1 L
77%
Lech H
0 - 2 L
72%
Crystal Palace A
2 - 2 D
68%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Zagłębie H
0 - 2 L
49%
Jagiellonia A
2 - 1 W
53%
Kielce H
1 - 0 W
43%
Legia A
1 - 1 D
64%
Cracovia H
3 - 0 W
40%
Widzew A
0 - 0 D
59%
Raków H
3 - 1 W
54%
Motor A
0 - 0 D
59%
GKS Katowice A
1 - 3 L
64%
Pogoń H
0 - 1 L
49%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Górnik has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 54.8) compared to KuPS (SoS: 40.8). This means Górnik's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with KuPS averaging 1.1 and Górnik averaging 1.1 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with KuPS conceding 1.2 and Górnik conceding 0.9 per match.

Górnik has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.1 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Górnik has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 9.6 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

KuPS

KuPS

VS
Górnik

Górnik

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more