Skip to content
Compare KuPS vs Kielce

KuPS vs Kielce Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare KuPS vs Kielce: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

KuPS KuPS Home Team
Kielce Kielce Away Team
KuPS
40.4
D L D W D W W L L D

Last 10 Matches

Kielce
39.9
L D D L D L W L W L

Categories Won

8

KuPS

4

Draw

3

Kielce

Performance Radar

KuPS
Kielce

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 4D, 3L

20%

2W, 3D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-1

-1

-4

-4

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
30%

3 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
J. Moreno (4 goals)
M. Pięczek (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 5
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
40.8

League Difficulty: 54.9, Opponent Quality: 53.9

54.1

League Difficulty: 57.0, Opponent Quality: 52.1

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.05

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.05

1.02

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.08

Adjusted Power Rating
40.4

Attack: 33.3, Defense: 54.5, Form: 27.2

39.9

Attack: 38.2, Defense: 52.0, Form: 20.8

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

16-30'

4
1

31-45'

2
4

46-60'

2

61-75'

1
3

76-90+'

2
KuPS
Kielce
KuPS

Power Rating Breakdown

40.4

Overall

Attack 33.3
Defense 54.5
Form 27.2
Consistency 57.7
Kielce

Power Rating Breakdown

39.9

Overall

Attack 38.2
Defense 52.0
Form 20.8
Consistency 61.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

54.9 vs 57.0

Opponent Quality

53.9 vs 52.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
KuPS logo KuPS
D
SJK (43%)
L
Oulu (53%)
D
HJK (50%)
W
Oulu (50%)
D
Jaro (44%)
W
Gnistan (39%)
W
Ilves (43%)
L
Lech (77%)
Kielce logo Kielce
L
Raków (59%)
D
Piast (53%)
D
GKS Katowice (59%)
L
Górnik (58%)
D
Jagiellonia (48%)
L
Lechia (51%)
W
Arka (44%)
L
Pogoń (54%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
SJK H
0 - 0 D
43%
Oulu A
0 - 2 L
53%
HJK H
1 - 1 D
50%
Oulu H
3 - 2 W
50%
Jaro A
1 - 1 D
44%
Gnistan H
1 - 0 W
39%
Ilves A
3 - 1 W
43%
Lech A
0 - 1 L
77%
Lech H
0 - 2 L
72%
Crystal Palace A
2 - 2 D
68%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Raków A
0 - 2 L
59%
Piast H
1 - 1 D
53%
GKS Katowice H
1 - 1 D
59%
Górnik A
0 - 1 L
58%
Jagiellonia H
1 - 1 D
48%
Lechia A
2 - 4 L
51%
Arka H
3 - 0 W
44%
Pogoń A
1 - 2 L
54%
Nieciecza H
2 - 1 W
36%
Motor A
0 - 2 L
59%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Kielce has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 54.1) compared to KuPS (SoS: 40.8). This means Kielce's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with KuPS averaging 1.1 and Kielce averaging 1.1 goals per match.

KuPS has the defensive edge, conceding 1.2 per match compared to Kielce's 1.5.

Kielce has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.5 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by the day's form, tactical adjustments, and perhaps a moment of individual brilliance.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

KuPS

KuPS

VS
Kielce

Kielce

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more