Skip to content
Compare KuPS vs Mainz 05

KuPS vs Mainz 05 Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare KuPS vs Mainz 05: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

KuPS KuPS Home Team
Mainz 05 Mainz 05 Away Team
KuPS
40.4
D L D W D W W L L D

Last 10 Matches

Mainz 05
55.4
L W L D L L W W W W

Categories Won

2

KuPS

3

Draw

10

Mainz 05

Performance Radar

KuPS
Mainz 05

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 4D, 3L

50%

5W, 1D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-1

-1

-1

-1

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
30%

3 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
J. Moreno (4 goals)
P. Tietz (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

50%

3W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
40.8

League Difficulty: 54.9, Opponent Quality: 53.9

69.0

League Difficulty: 87.1, Opponent Quality: 61.8

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

50%

1W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.05

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.05

1.84

Actual: 1.5 | Diff: -0.34

Adjusted Power Rating
40.4

Attack: 33.3, Defense: 54.5, Form: 27.2

55.4

Attack: 59.5, Defense: 55.5, Form: 59.5

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

5

16-30'

2
1

31-45'

1
4

46-60'

3

61-75'

3

76-90+'

4
KuPS
Mainz 05
KuPS

Power Rating Breakdown

40.4

Overall

Attack 33.3
Defense 54.5
Form 27.2
Consistency 57.7
Mainz 05

Power Rating Breakdown

55.4

Overall

Attack 59.5
Defense 55.5
Form 59.5
Consistency 38.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

54.9 vs 87.1

Opponent Quality

53.9 vs 61.8

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 50%
KuPS logo KuPS
D
SJK (43%)
L
Oulu (53%)
D
HJK (50%)
W
Oulu (50%)
D
Jaro (44%)
W
Gnistan (39%)
W
Ilves (43%)
L
Lech (77%)
Mainz 05 logo Mainz 05
L
Union Berlin (52%)
W
St. Pauli (55%)
L
Bayern Munich (81%)
D
M'gladbach (68%)
L
Strasbourg (57%)
L
Freiburg (67%)
W
Strasbourg (52%)
W
Hoffenheim (70%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
SJK H
0 - 0 D
43%
Oulu A
0 - 2 L
53%
HJK H
1 - 1 D
50%
Oulu H
3 - 2 W
50%
Jaro A
1 - 1 D
44%
Gnistan H
1 - 0 W
39%
Ilves A
3 - 1 W
43%
Lech A
0 - 1 L
77%
Lech H
0 - 2 L
72%
Crystal Palace A
2 - 2 D
68%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Union Berlin H
1 - 3 L
52%
St. Pauli A
2 - 1 W
55%
Bayern Munich H
3 - 4 L
81%
M'gladbach A
1 - 1 D
68%
Strasbourg A
0 - 4 L
57%
Freiburg H
0 - 1 L
67%
Strasbourg H
2 - 0 W
52%
Hoffenheim A
2 - 1 W
70%
Frankfurt H
2 - 1 W
62%
Olomouc H
2 - 0 W
54%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Mainz 05 has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 69.0) compared to KuPS (SoS: 40.8). This means Mainz 05's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Mainz 05 holds the attacking edge with 1.5 goals per match versus KuPS's 1.1, though the gap is not insurmountable.

KuPS has the defensive edge, conceding 1.2 per match compared to Mainz 05's 1.6.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.7 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Mainz 05 emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (55.4 vs 40.4) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

KuPS

KuPS

VS
Mainz 05

Mainz 05

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more