Compare KuPS vs Malmö

KuPS vs Malmö Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare KuPS vs Malmö: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

KuPS Home Team

Malmö Away Team

KuPS

40.4

D L D W D W W L L D

Last 10 Matches

Malmö

39.9

L L W L W W D L L L

Categories Won

KuPS

Draw

Malmö

Performance Radar

KuPS

Malmö

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

30%

3W, 4D, 3L

30%

3W, 1D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match

1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-1

-2

Clean Sheet

20%

2 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

30%

3 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

J. Moreno (4 goals)

S. Hakšabanović (3 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 7

1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 7

Home Win Rate

40%

2W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate

20%

1W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

40.8

League Difficulty: 54.9, Opponent Quality: 53.9

45.2

League Difficulty: 60.5, Opponent Quality: 60.1

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 2 matches

0W / 3 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.05

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.05

1.44

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.04

Adjusted Power Rating

40.4

Attack: 33.3, Defense: 54.5, Form: 27.2

39.9

Attack: 44.4, Defense: 44.4, Form: 28.6

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

KuPS

Malmö

Power Rating Breakdown

40.4

Overall

Attack 33.3

Defense 54.5

Form 27.2

Consistency 57.7

Power Rating Breakdown

39.9

Overall

Attack 44.4

Defense 44.4

Form 28.6

Consistency 46.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

54.9 vs 60.5

Opponent Quality

53.9 vs 60.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

KuPS

Malmö

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

SJK H

Finnish Veikkausliiga

0 - 0 D

43%

Oulu A

Finnish Veikkausliiga

0 - 2 L

53%

HJK H

Finnish Veikkausliiga

1 - 1 D

50%

Oulu H

Finnish Veikkausliiga

3 - 2 W

50%

Jaro A

Finnish Veikkausliiga

1 - 1 D

44%

Gnistan H

Finnish Veikkausliiga

1 - 0 W

39%

Ilves A

Finnish Veikkausliiga

3 - 1 W

43%

Lech A

UEFA Conference League

0 - 1 L

77%

Lech H

UEFA Conference League

0 - 2 L

72%

Crystal Palace A

UEFA Conference League

2 - 2 D

68%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Häcken A

Swedish Allsvenskan

2 - 3 L

58%

Mjällby H

Swedish Allsvenskan

2 - 3 L

54%

AIK A

Swedish Allsvenskan

1 - 0 W

49%

Sirius H

Swedish Allsvenskan

2 - 3 L

65%

Djurgården A

Swedish Allsvenskan

1 - 0 W

59%

GAIS H

Swedish Allsvenskan

3 - 1 W

47%

Örgryte A

Swedish Allsvenskan

1 - 1 D

41%

Genk A

UEFA Europa League

1 - 2 L

70%

Red Star H

UEFA Europa League

0 - 1 L

81%

Porto A

UEFA Europa League

1 - 2 L

77%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 40.8 vs 45.2), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with KuPS averaging 1.1 and Malmö averaging 1.4 goals per match.

KuPS has the defensive edge, conceding 1.2 per match compared to Malmö's 1.6.

Malmö has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.6 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by the day's form, tactical adjustments, and perhaps a moment of individual brilliance.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

KuPS

Malmö

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair