Compare KuPS vs Panathinaikos

KuPS vs Panathinaikos Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare KuPS vs Panathinaikos: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

KuPS Home Team

Panathinaikos Away Team

KuPS

40.4

D L D W D W W L L D

Last 10 Matches

Panathinaikos

45.5

L D L D W L D W W W

Categories Won

KuPS

Draw

Panathinaikos

Performance Radar

KuPS

Panathinaikos

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

30%

3W, 4D, 3L

40%

4W, 3D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match

1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-1

Clean Sheet

20%

2 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

30%

3 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

50%

5 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

J. Moreno (4 goals)

A. Zaroury (2 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 7

1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 6

Home Win Rate

40%

2W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

20%

1W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

40.8

League Difficulty: 54.9, Opponent Quality: 53.9

45.1

League Difficulty: 61.8, Opponent Quality: 58.1

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 2 matches

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.05

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.05

0.95

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.25

Adjusted Power Rating

40.4

Attack: 33.3, Defense: 54.5, Form: 27.2

45.5

Attack: 38.0, Defense: 60.2, Form: 38.0

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

KuPS

Panathinaikos

Power Rating Breakdown

40.4

Overall

Attack 33.3

Defense 54.5

Form 27.2

Consistency 57.7

Power Rating Breakdown

45.5

Overall

Attack 38.0

Defense 60.2

Form 38.0

Consistency 50.5

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

54.9 vs 61.8

Opponent Quality

53.9 vs 58.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

KuPS

Panathinaikos

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

SJK H

Finnish Veikkausliiga

0 - 0 D

43%

Oulu A

Finnish Veikkausliiga

0 - 2 L

53%

HJK H

Finnish Veikkausliiga

1 - 1 D

50%

Oulu H

Finnish Veikkausliiga

3 - 2 W

50%

Jaro A

Finnish Veikkausliiga

1 - 1 D

44%

Gnistan H

Finnish Veikkausliiga

1 - 0 W

39%

Ilves A

Finnish Veikkausliiga

3 - 1 W

43%

Lech A

UEFA Conference League

0 - 1 L

77%

Lech H

UEFA Conference League

0 - 2 L

72%

Crystal Palace A

UEFA Conference League

2 - 2 D

68%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

AEK Athens A

Greek Super League

1 - 2 L

67%

AEK Athens H

Greek Super League

0 - 0 D

62%

Olympiakos H

Greek Super League

0 - 2 L

56%

PAOK A

Greek Super League

0 - 0 D

59%

Asteras A

Greek Super League

2 - 1 W

61%

Betis A

UEFA Europa League

0 - 4 L

70%

Panaitolikos H

Greek Super League

0 - 0 D

48%

Betis H

UEFA Europa League

1 - 0 W

65%

Levadiakos A

Greek Super League

4 - 1 W

49%

OFI H

Greek Super League

4 - 1 W

44%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 40.8 vs 45.1), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with KuPS averaging 1.1 and Panathinaikos averaging 1.2 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with KuPS conceding 1.2 and Panathinaikos conceding 1.1 per match.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.3 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Panathinaikos has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 5.1 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

KuPS

Panathinaikos

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair