Skip to content
Compare KuPS vs Parma

KuPS vs Parma Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare KuPS vs Parma: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

KuPS KuPS Home Team
Parma Parma Away Team
KuPS
40.4
D L D W D W W L L D

Last 10 Matches

Parma
40.5
L L W W D D L L D D

Categories Won

8

KuPS

3

Draw

4

Parma

Performance Radar

KuPS
Parma

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 4D, 3L

20%

2W, 4D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-1

-1

-6

-6

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
30%

3 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
J. Moreno (4 goals)
N. Elphege (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 5
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
40.8

League Difficulty: 54.9, Opponent Quality: 53.9

63.0

League Difficulty: 90.0, Opponent Quality: 67.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

14%

1W / 7 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.05

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.05

1.0

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.2

Adjusted Power Rating
40.4

Attack: 33.3, Defense: 54.5, Form: 27.2

40.5

Attack: 30.1, Defense: 60.3, Form: 22.6

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

2

16-30'

1
1

31-45'

4

46-60'

2

61-75'

3

76-90+'

3
KuPS
Parma
KuPS

Power Rating Breakdown

40.4

Overall

Attack 33.3
Defense 54.5
Form 27.2
Consistency 57.7
Parma

Power Rating Breakdown

40.5

Overall

Attack 30.1
Defense 60.3
Form 22.6
Consistency 64.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

54.9 vs 90.0

Opponent Quality

53.9 vs 67.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 14%
KuPS logo KuPS
D
SJK (43%)
L
Oulu (53%)
D
HJK (50%)
W
Oulu (50%)
D
Jaro (44%)
W
Gnistan (39%)
W
Ilves (43%)
L
Lech (77%)
Parma logo Parma
L
Roma (70%)
L
Inter Milan (84%)
W
Pisa (40%)
W
Udinese (79%)
D
Napoli (74%)
D
Lazio (76%)
L
Cremonese (51%)
L
Torino (74%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
SJK H
0 - 0 D
43%
Oulu A
0 - 2 L
53%
HJK H
1 - 1 D
50%
Oulu H
3 - 2 W
50%
Jaro A
1 - 1 D
44%
Gnistan H
1 - 0 W
39%
Ilves A
3 - 1 W
43%
Lech A
0 - 1 L
77%
Lech H
0 - 2 L
72%
Crystal Palace A
2 - 2 D
68%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Roma H
2 - 3 L
70%
Inter Milan A
0 - 2 L
84%
Pisa H
1 - 0 W
40%
Udinese A
1 - 0 W
79%
Napoli H
1 - 1 D
74%
Lazio A
1 - 1 D
76%
Cremonese H
0 - 2 L
51%
Torino A
1 - 4 L
74%
Fiorentina A
0 - 0 D
71%
Cagliari H
1 - 1 D
53%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Parma has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 63.0) compared to KuPS (SoS: 40.8). This means Parma's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

KuPS holds the attacking edge with 1.1 goals per match versus Parma's 0.8, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with KuPS conceding 1.2 and Parma conceding 1.4 per match.

Parma has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 7 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.2 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by the day's form, tactical adjustments, and perhaps a moment of individual brilliance.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

KuPS

KuPS

VS
Parma

Parma

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more