Skip to content
Compare KuPS vs Sion

KuPS vs Sion Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare KuPS vs Sion: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

KuPS KuPS Home Team
Sion Sion Away Team
KuPS
40.4
D L D W D W W L L D

Last 10 Matches

Sion
66.0
W W W W W D W D L D

Categories Won

2

KuPS

2

Draw

11

Sion

Performance Radar

KuPS
Sion

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 4D, 3L

60%

6W, 3D, 1L

Goals Scored / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

0.5

5 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-1

-1

+14

+14

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
30%

3 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
J. Moreno (4 goals)
W. Boteli (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 12
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

67%

4W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
40.8

League Difficulty: 54.9, Opponent Quality: 53.9

48.3

League Difficulty: 48.0, Opponent Quality: 48.5

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.05

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.05

1.92

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.02

Adjusted Power Rating
40.4

Attack: 33.3, Defense: 54.5, Form: 27.2

66.0

Attack: 62.3, Defense: 81.9, Form: 59.0

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

2

16-30'

4
1

31-45'

1
4

46-60'

2

61-75'

7
3

76-90+'

3
KuPS
Sion
KuPS

Power Rating Breakdown

40.4

Overall

Attack 33.3
Defense 54.5
Form 27.2
Consistency 57.7
Sion

Power Rating Breakdown

66.0

Overall

Attack 62.3
Defense 81.9
Form 59.0
Consistency 61.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

54.9 vs 48.0

Opponent Quality

53.9 vs 48.5

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
KuPS logo KuPS
D
SJK (43%)
L
Oulu (53%)
D
HJK (50%)
W
Oulu (50%)
D
Jaro (44%)
W
Gnistan (39%)
W
Ilves (43%)
L
Lech (77%)
Sion logo Sion
W
Thun (48%)
W
St.Gallen (64%)
W
Basel (55%)
W
Lausanne (38%)
W
GC Zürich (32%)
D
St.Gallen (55%)
W
Zürich (37%)
D
Winterthur (38%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
SJK H
0 - 0 D
43%
Oulu A
0 - 2 L
53%
HJK H
1 - 1 D
50%
Oulu H
3 - 2 W
50%
Jaro A
1 - 1 D
44%
Gnistan H
1 - 0 W
39%
Ilves A
3 - 1 W
43%
Lech A
0 - 1 L
77%
Lech H
0 - 2 L
72%
Crystal Palace A
2 - 2 D
68%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Thun H
2 - 0 W
48%
St.Gallen A
3 - 0 W
64%
Basel A
2 - 0 W
55%
Lausanne H
3 - 0 W
38%
GC Zürich A
4 - 0 W
32%
St.Gallen H
1 - 1 D
55%
Zürich A
2 - 1 W
37%
Winterthur H
1 - 1 D
38%
Lugano A
1 - 2 L
55%
Servette A
0 - 0 D
63%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 40.8 vs 48.3), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Sion holds the attacking edge with 1.9 goals per match versus KuPS's 1.1, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Sion has the defensive edge, conceding 0.5 per match compared to KuPS's 1.2.

Sion has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Sion is a strong road team with a 67% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.3 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Sion emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (66.0 vs 40.4) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

KuPS

KuPS

VS
Sion

Sion

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more