Skip to content
Compare KuPS vs Tondela

KuPS vs Tondela Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare KuPS vs Tondela: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

KuPS KuPS Home Team
Tondela Tondela Away Team
KuPS
40.4
D L D W D W W L L D

Last 10 Matches

Tondela
37.0
W W D L L D L D L D

Categories Won

9

KuPS

2

Draw

4

Tondela

Performance Radar

KuPS
Tondela

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 4D, 3L

20%

2W, 4D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

0.9

9 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-1

-1

-7

-7

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
30%

3 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
J. Moreno (4 goals)
Rony Lopes (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
40.8

League Difficulty: 54.9, Opponent Quality: 53.9

52.7

League Difficulty: 79.0, Opponent Quality: 60.4

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.05

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.05

0.92

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: -0.02

Adjusted Power Rating
40.4

Attack: 33.3, Defense: 54.5, Form: 27.2

37.0

Attack: 30.8, Defense: 47.9, Form: 20.5

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

2

16-30'

1
1

31-45'

4

46-60'

2

61-75'

1
3

76-90+'

3
KuPS
Tondela
KuPS

Power Rating Breakdown

40.4

Overall

Attack 33.3
Defense 54.5
Form 27.2
Consistency 57.7
Tondela

Power Rating Breakdown

37.0

Overall

Attack 30.8
Defense 47.9
Form 20.5
Consistency 64.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

54.9 vs 79.0

Opponent Quality

53.9 vs 60.4

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
KuPS logo KuPS
D
SJK (43%)
L
Oulu (53%)
D
HJK (50%)
W
Oulu (50%)
D
Jaro (44%)
W
Gnistan (39%)
W
Ilves (43%)
L
Lech (77%)
Tondela logo Tondela
W
Moreirense (50%)
W
Casa Pia (53%)
D
Sporting (75%)
L
Nacional (52%)
L
Porto (74%)
D
Gil Vicente (55%)
L
Vitória SC (59%)
D
AVS (59%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
SJK H
0 - 0 D
43%
Oulu A
0 - 2 L
53%
HJK H
1 - 1 D
50%
Oulu H
3 - 2 W
50%
Jaro A
1 - 1 D
44%
Gnistan H
1 - 0 W
39%
Ilves A
3 - 1 W
43%
Lech A
0 - 1 L
77%
Lech H
0 - 2 L
72%
Crystal Palace A
2 - 2 D
68%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Moreirense H
2 - 0 W
50%
Casa Pia A
1 - 0 W
53%
Sporting A
2 - 2 D
75%
Nacional H
0 - 2 L
52%
Porto A
0 - 2 L
74%
Gil Vicente H
2 - 2 D
55%
Vitória SC A
0 - 5 L
59%
AVS H
0 - 0 D
59%
Rio Ave H
0 - 1 L
61%
Santa Clara H
2 - 2 D
66%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Tondela has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 52.7) compared to KuPS (SoS: 40.8). This means Tondela's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with KuPS averaging 1.1 and Tondela averaging 0.9 goals per match.

KuPS has the defensive edge, conceding 1.2 per match compared to Tondela's 1.6.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.4 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

KuPS

KuPS

VS
Tondela

Tondela

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more