Skip to content
Compare KuPS vs Volos

KuPS vs Volos Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare KuPS vs Volos: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

KuPS KuPS Home Team
Volos Volos Away Team
KuPS
40.4
D L D W D W W L L D

Last 10 Matches

Volos
34.6
L L L D W L D D L D

Categories Won

8

KuPS

2

Draw

5

Volos

Performance Radar

KuPS
Volos

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 4D, 3L

10%

1W, 4D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

2.1

21 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-1

-1

-9

-9

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
30%

3 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
J. Moreno (4 goals)
J. Hurtado (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
40.8

League Difficulty: 54.9, Opponent Quality: 53.9

53.4

League Difficulty: 56.0, Opponent Quality: 51.6

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.05

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.05

1.2

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: 0.0

Adjusted Power Rating
40.4

Attack: 33.3, Defense: 54.5, Form: 27.2

34.6

Attack: 41.4, Defense: 31.0, Form: 10.3

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

1

16-30'

1
1

31-45'

2
4

46-60'

1

61-75'

3
3

76-90+'

4
KuPS
Volos
KuPS

Power Rating Breakdown

40.4

Overall

Attack 33.3
Defense 54.5
Form 27.2
Consistency 57.7
Volos

Power Rating Breakdown

34.6

Overall

Attack 41.4
Defense 31.0
Form 10.3
Consistency 75.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

54.9 vs 56.0

Opponent Quality

53.9 vs 51.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
KuPS logo KuPS
D
SJK (43%)
L
Oulu (53%)
D
HJK (50%)
W
Oulu (50%)
D
Jaro (44%)
W
Gnistan (39%)
W
Ilves (43%)
L
Lech (77%)
Volos logo Volos
L
Levadiakos (44%)
L
Levadiakos (49%)
L
Aris (58%)
D
OFI (44%)
W
PAOK (54%)
L
Kifisia (54%)
D
OFI (44%)
D
AEK Athens (62%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
SJK H
0 - 0 D
43%
Oulu A
0 - 2 L
53%
HJK H
1 - 1 D
50%
Oulu H
3 - 2 W
50%
Jaro A
1 - 1 D
44%
Gnistan H
1 - 0 W
39%
Ilves A
3 - 1 W
43%
Lech A
0 - 1 L
77%
Lech H
0 - 2 L
72%
Crystal Palace A
2 - 2 D
68%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Levadiakos H
0 - 3 L
44%
Levadiakos A
2 - 5 L
49%
Aris A
2 - 3 L
58%
OFI H
1 - 1 D
44%
PAOK H
2 - 1 W
54%
Kifisia A
0 - 2 L
54%
OFI H
1 - 1 D
44%
AEK Athens H
2 - 2 D
62%
Panserraikos A
1 - 2 L
54%
Aris H
1 - 1 D
53%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Volos has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 53.4) compared to KuPS (SoS: 40.8). This means Volos's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with KuPS averaging 1.1 and Volos averaging 1.2 goals per match.

Defensively, KuPS is far superior, conceding just 1.2 goals per match with 2 clean sheets, while Volos leaks 2.1 per match.

Volos has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

KuPS has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 5.8 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

KuPS

KuPS

VS
Volos

Volos

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more