Compare Larissa vs Angers

Larissa vs Angers Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Larissa vs Angers: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Larissa Home Team

Angers Away Team

Larissa

37.4

D D D L D L L L D D

Last 10 Matches

Angers

30.8

D L L D L D L L W L

Categories Won

Larissa

Draw

Angers

Performance Radar

Larissa

Angers

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

0W, 6D, 4L

10%

1W, 3D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match

0.9

9 / 10 matches

0.6

6 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-5

-13

Clean Sheet

10%

1 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

30%

3 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

80%

8 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

Ľ. Tupta (3 goals)

P. Peter (2 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 1 / 2nd Half: 8

1st Half: 1 / 2nd Half: 5

Home Win Rate

0W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

0W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

55.2

League Difficulty: 56.0, Opponent Quality: 54.6

57.7

League Difficulty: 86.0, Opponent Quality: 66.7

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 0 matches

0W / 5 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

0.95

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: -0.05

0.6

Actual: 0.6 | Diff: 0.0

Adjusted Power Rating

37.4

Attack: 31.6, Defense: 56.1, Form: 0.0

30.8

Attack: 21.5, Defense: 39.5, Form: 10.8

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Larissa

Angers

Power Rating Breakdown

37.4

Overall

Attack 31.6

Defense 56.1

Form 0.0

Consistency 92.8

Power Rating Breakdown

30.8

Overall

Attack 21.5

Defense 39.5

Form 10.8

Consistency 74.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

56.0 vs 86.0

Opponent Quality

54.6 vs 66.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Larissa

Angers

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Panaitolikos A

Greek Super League

1 - 1 D

53%

Asteras H

Greek Super League

1 - 1 D

56%

Panserraikos A

Greek Super League

1 - 1 D

54%

Panserraikos H

Greek Super League

0 - 1 L

49%

Kifisia H

Greek Super League

1 - 1 D

49%

Atromitos A

Greek Super League

2 - 3 L

59%

Panaitolikos H

Greek Super League

1 - 2 L

48%

Asteras A

Greek Super League

1 - 3 L

61%

Olympiakos A

Greek Super League

0 - 0 D

61%

Asteras H

Greek Super League

1 - 1 D

56%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Strasbourg H

French Ligue 1

1 - 1 D

55%

Auxerre A

French Ligue 1

1 - 3 L

71%

Paris SG H

French Ligue 1

0 - 3 L

79%

Le Havre H

French Ligue 1

1 - 1 D

53%

Rennes A

French Ligue 1

1 - 2 L

80%

Lyon H

French Ligue 1

0 - 0 D

65%

Lens A

French Ligue 1

1 - 5 L

76%

Nice H

French Ligue 1

0 - 2 L

55%

Nantes A

French Ligue 1

1 - 0 W

56%

Monaco A

French Ligue 1

0 - 2 L

77%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 55.2 vs 57.7), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Larissa holds the attacking edge with 0.9 goals per match versus Angers's 0.6, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Larissa has the defensive edge, conceding 1.4 per match compared to Angers's 1.9.

Larissa has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Angers has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 5 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.4 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Larissa has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 6.6 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Larissa

Angers

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair