Skip to content
Compare Larissa vs Lausanne

Larissa vs Lausanne Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Larissa vs Lausanne: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Larissa Larissa Home Team
Lausanne Lausanne Away Team
Larissa
37.4
D D D L D L L L D D

Last 10 Matches

Lausanne
33.3
L L L W L W L L W W

Categories Won

5

Larissa

4

Draw

6

Lausanne

Performance Radar

Larissa
Lausanne

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
0%

0W, 6D, 4L

40%

4W, 0D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
0.9

9 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-5

-5

-8

-8

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
30%

3 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
Ľ. Tupta (3 goals)
Omar Janneh (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 1 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 5
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
55.2

League Difficulty: 56.0, Opponent Quality: 54.6

36.8

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 49.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.95

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: -0.05

1.05

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.15

Adjusted Power Rating
37.4

Attack: 31.6, Defense: 56.1, Form: 0.0

33.3

Attack: 34.7, Defense: 28.9, Form: 34.7

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

1

16-30'

3
1

31-45'

2
4

46-60'

3

61-75'

2
4

76-90+'

1
Larissa
Lausanne
Larissa

Power Rating Breakdown

37.4

Overall

Attack 31.6
Defense 56.1
Form 0.0
Consistency 92.8
Lausanne

Power Rating Breakdown

33.3

Overall

Attack 34.7
Defense 28.9
Form 34.7
Consistency 35.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

56.0 vs 49.0

Opponent Quality

54.6 vs 49.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Larissa logo Larissa
D
Panaitolikos (53%)
D
Asteras (56%)
D
Panserraikos (54%)
L
Panserraikos (49%)
D
Kifisia (49%)
L
Atromitos (59%)
L
Panaitolikos (48%)
L
Asteras (61%)
Lausanne logo Lausanne
L
Servette (70%)
L
Winterthur (46%)
L
Luzern (56%)
W
Zürich (37%)
L
Sion (66%)
W
Winterthur (38%)
L
Luzern (57%)
L
Young Boys (50%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Panaitolikos A
1 - 1 D
53%
Asteras H
1 - 1 D
56%
Panserraikos A
1 - 1 D
54%
Panserraikos H
0 - 1 L
49%
Kifisia H
1 - 1 D
49%
Atromitos A
2 - 3 L
59%
Panaitolikos H
1 - 2 L
48%
Asteras A
1 - 3 L
61%
Olympiakos A
0 - 0 D
61%
Asteras H
1 - 1 D
56%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Servette A
0 - 2 L
70%
Winterthur A
1 - 2 L
46%
Luzern H
1 - 3 L
56%
Zürich H
3 - 0 W
37%
Sion A
0 - 3 L
66%
Winterthur H
2 - 1 W
38%
Luzern A
0 - 4 L
57%
Young Boys H
0 - 2 L
50%
GC Zürich A
3 - 2 W
32%
Zürich A
2 - 1 W
38%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Larissa has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 55.2) compared to Lausanne (SoS: 36.8). This means Larissa's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Larissa averaging 0.9 and Lausanne averaging 1.2 goals per match.

Larissa has the defensive edge, conceding 1.4 per match compared to Lausanne's 2.0.

Larissa has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Larissa

Larissa

VS
Lausanne

Lausanne

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more