Skip to content
Compare Lausanne vs Slaven

Lausanne vs Slaven Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Lausanne vs Slaven: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Lausanne Lausanne Home Team
Slaven Slaven Away Team
Lausanne
33.3
L L L W L W L L W W

Last 10 Matches

Slaven
31.9
W L D L D L L D L D

Categories Won

7

Lausanne

4

Draw

4

Slaven

Performance Radar

Lausanne
Slaven

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 0D, 6L

10%

1W, 4D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.0

20 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-8

-8

-7

-7

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
Omar Janneh (3 goals)
M. Dabro (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 5
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
36.8

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 49.0

35.1

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 48.8

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.05

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.15

1.04

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.16

Adjusted Power Rating
33.3

Attack: 34.7, Defense: 28.9, Form: 34.7

31.9

Attack: 34.0, Defense: 31.2, Form: 8.5

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1
3

16-30'

2

31-45'

5
3

46-60'

3
2

61-75'

2
1

76-90+'

1
Lausanne
Slaven
Lausanne

Power Rating Breakdown

33.3

Overall

Attack 34.7
Defense 28.9
Form 34.7
Consistency 35.2
Slaven

Power Rating Breakdown

31.9

Overall

Attack 34.0
Defense 31.2
Form 8.5
Consistency 75.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

49.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

49.0 vs 48.8

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Lausanne logo Lausanne
L
Servette (70%)
L
Winterthur (46%)
L
Luzern (56%)
W
Zürich (37%)
L
Sion (66%)
W
Winterthur (38%)
L
Luzern (57%)
L
Young Boys (50%)
Slaven logo Slaven
W
Gorica (44%)
L
Istra (46%)
D
Vukovar (32%)
L
Lokomotiva (49%)
D
Hajduk (53%)
L
Varaždin (54%)
L
Rijeka (44%)
D
Osijek (40%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Servette A
0 - 2 L
70%
Winterthur A
1 - 2 L
46%
Luzern H
1 - 3 L
56%
Zürich H
3 - 0 W
37%
Sion A
0 - 3 L
66%
Winterthur H
2 - 1 W
38%
Luzern A
0 - 4 L
57%
Young Boys H
0 - 2 L
50%
GC Zürich A
3 - 2 W
32%
Zürich A
2 - 1 W
38%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Gorica H
1 - 0 W
44%
Istra A
1 - 3 L
46%
Vukovar H
2 - 2 D
32%
Lokomotiva A
1 - 2 L
49%
Hajduk H
2 - 2 D
53%
Varaždin A
1 - 2 L
54%
Rijeka H
0 - 2 L
44%
Osijek H
0 - 0 D
40%
Dinamo Zagreb A
2 - 4 L
76%
Gorica A
2 - 2 D
50%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 36.8 vs 35.1), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Lausanne averaging 1.2 and Slaven averaging 1.2 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with Lausanne conceding 2.0 and Slaven conceding 1.9 per match.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.2 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by the day's form, tactical adjustments, and perhaps a moment of individual brilliance.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Lausanne

Lausanne

VS
Slaven

Slaven

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more