Skip to content
Compare Lausanne vs Varaždin

Lausanne vs Varaždin Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Lausanne vs Varaždin: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Lausanne Lausanne Home Team
Varaždin Varaždin Away Team
Lausanne
33.3
L L L W L W L L W W

Last 10 Matches

Varaždin
42.1
D L L W W W D L W D

Categories Won

3

Lausanne

3

Draw

9

Varaždin

Performance Radar

Lausanne
Varaždin

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 0D, 6L

40%

4W, 3D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.0

20 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-8

-8

+2

+2

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
Omar Janneh (3 goals)
A. Latković (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 5
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 5
Home Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
36.8

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 49.0

34.6

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 47.4

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.05

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.15

1.06

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.24

Adjusted Power Rating
33.3

Attack: 34.7, Defense: 28.9, Form: 34.7

42.1

Attack: 36.7, Defense: 53.6, Form: 33.8

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

4
3

16-30'

3
2

31-45'

1
3

46-60'

2
2

61-75'

2
1

76-90+'

1
Lausanne
Varaždin
Lausanne

Power Rating Breakdown

33.3

Overall

Attack 34.7
Defense 28.9
Form 34.7
Consistency 35.2
Varaždin

Power Rating Breakdown

42.1

Overall

Attack 36.7
Defense 53.6
Form 33.8
Consistency 50.5

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

49.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

49.0 vs 47.4

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Lausanne logo Lausanne
L
Servette (70%)
L
Winterthur (46%)
L
Luzern (56%)
W
Zürich (37%)
L
Sion (66%)
W
Winterthur (38%)
L
Luzern (57%)
L
Young Boys (50%)
Varaždin logo Varaždin
D
Lokomotiva (44%)
L
Hajduk (58%)
L
Dinamo Zagreb (76%)
W
Rijeka (44%)
W
Osijek (46%)
W
Slaven (35%)
D
Gorica (44%)
L
Istra (46%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Servette A
0 - 2 L
70%
Winterthur A
1 - 2 L
46%
Luzern H
1 - 3 L
56%
Zürich H
3 - 0 W
37%
Sion A
0 - 3 L
66%
Winterthur H
2 - 1 W
38%
Luzern A
0 - 4 L
57%
Young Boys H
0 - 2 L
50%
GC Zürich A
3 - 2 W
32%
Zürich A
2 - 1 W
38%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Lokomotiva H
1 - 1 D
44%
Hajduk A
1 - 3 L
58%
Dinamo Zagreb A
1 - 2 L
76%
Rijeka H
1 - 0 W
44%
Osijek A
2 - 0 W
46%
Slaven H
2 - 1 W
35%
Gorica H
1 - 1 D
44%
Istra A
1 - 2 L
46%
Vukovar H
2 - 0 W
32%
Lokomotiva A
1 - 1 D
49%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 36.8 vs 34.6), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Lausanne averaging 1.2 and Varaždin averaging 1.3 goals per match.

Defensively, Varaždin is far superior, conceding just 1.1 goals per match with 3 clean sheets, while Lausanne leaks 2.0 per match.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Varaždin has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 8.8 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Lausanne

Lausanne

VS
Varaždin

Varaždin

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more