Skip to content
Compare Le Havre vs Brøndby

Le Havre vs Brøndby Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Le Havre vs Brøndby: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Le Havre Le Havre Home Team
Brøndby Brøndby Away Team
Le Havre
38.0
L D D D D D L D L L

Last 10 Matches

Brøndby
42.4
L D L W W L L D L D

Categories Won

3

Le Havre

3

Draw

9

Brøndby

Performance Radar

Le Havre
Brøndby

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
0%

0W, 6D, 4L

20%

2W, 3D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-5

-5

-1

-1

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
20%

2 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Samatta (2 goals)
J. Ambæk (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 4
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
56.9

League Difficulty: 86.0, Opponent Quality: 64.2

54.3

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 53.9

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 3 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.16

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.16

1.03

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.03

Adjusted Power Rating
38.0

Attack: 35.6, Defense: 53.4, Form: 0.0

42.4

Attack: 34.8, Defense: 66.1, Form: 20.9

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

1

16-30'

1
2

31-45'

2
1

46-60'

3
2

61-75'

1
1

76-90+'

3
Le Havre
Brøndby
Le Havre

Power Rating Breakdown

38.0

Overall

Attack 35.6
Defense 53.4
Form 0.0
Consistency 92.8
Brøndby

Power Rating Breakdown

42.4

Overall

Attack 34.8
Defense 66.1
Form 20.9
Consistency 61.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

86.0 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

64.2 vs 53.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Le Havre logo Le Havre
L
Marseille (61%)
D
Lille (78%)
D
Metz (43%)
D
Angers (52%)
D
Nice (60%)
D
Auxerre (66%)
L
Paris FC (77%)
D
Lyon (65%)
Brøndby logo Brøndby
L
AGF (57%)
D
Nordsjælland (55%)
L
Sønderjyske (48%)
W
Viborg (55%)
W
Sønderjyske (43%)
L
Midtjylland (52%)
L
Nordsjælland (60%)
D
AGF (62%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Marseille H
0 - 1 L
61%
Lille A
1 - 1 D
78%
Metz H
4 - 4 D
43%
Angers A
1 - 1 D
52%
Nice A
1 - 1 D
60%
Auxerre H
1 - 1 D
66%
Paris FC A
2 - 3 L
77%
Lyon H
0 - 0 D
65%
Brest A
0 - 2 L
61%
Paris SG H
0 - 1 L
79%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
AGF H
0 - 2 L
57%
Nordsjælland H
1 - 1 D
55%
Sønderjyske A
0 - 3 L
48%
Viborg A
1 - 0 W
55%
Sønderjyske H
6 - 0 W
43%
Midtjylland H
1 - 2 L
52%
Nordsjælland A
1 - 2 L
60%
AGF A
0 - 0 D
62%
Viborg H
0 - 1 L
50%
Midtjylland A
0 - 0 D
57%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 56.9 vs 54.3), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Le Havre averaging 1.0 and Brøndby averaging 1.0 goals per match.

Brøndby has the defensive edge, conceding 1.1 per match compared to Le Havre's 1.5.

Le Havre has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Brøndby has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.3 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Le Havre

Le Havre

VS
Brøndby

Brøndby

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more