Skip to content
Compare Le Havre vs Lausanne

Le Havre vs Lausanne Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Le Havre vs Lausanne: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Le Havre Le Havre Home Team
Lausanne Lausanne Away Team
Le Havre
38.0
L D D D D D L D L L

Last 10 Matches

Lausanne
33.3
L L L W L W L L W W

Categories Won

6

Le Havre

3

Draw

6

Lausanne

Performance Radar

Le Havre
Lausanne

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
0%

0W, 6D, 4L

40%

4W, 0D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-5

-5

-8

-8

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
20%

2 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Samatta (2 goals)
Omar Janneh (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 4
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 5
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
56.9

League Difficulty: 86.0, Opponent Quality: 64.2

36.8

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 49.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 3 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.16

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.16

1.05

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.15

Adjusted Power Rating
38.0

Attack: 35.6, Defense: 53.4, Form: 0.0

33.3

Attack: 34.7, Defense: 28.9, Form: 34.7

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

1
1

16-30'

3
2

31-45'

2
1

46-60'

3
2

61-75'

2
1

76-90+'

1
Le Havre
Lausanne
Le Havre

Power Rating Breakdown

38.0

Overall

Attack 35.6
Defense 53.4
Form 0.0
Consistency 92.8
Lausanne

Power Rating Breakdown

33.3

Overall

Attack 34.7
Defense 28.9
Form 34.7
Consistency 35.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

86.0 vs 49.0

Opponent Quality

64.2 vs 49.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Le Havre logo Le Havre
L
Marseille (61%)
D
Lille (78%)
D
Metz (43%)
D
Angers (52%)
D
Nice (60%)
D
Auxerre (66%)
L
Paris FC (77%)
D
Lyon (65%)
Lausanne logo Lausanne
L
Servette (70%)
L
Winterthur (46%)
L
Luzern (56%)
W
Zürich (37%)
L
Sion (66%)
W
Winterthur (38%)
L
Luzern (57%)
L
Young Boys (50%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Marseille H
0 - 1 L
61%
Lille A
1 - 1 D
78%
Metz H
4 - 4 D
43%
Angers A
1 - 1 D
52%
Nice A
1 - 1 D
60%
Auxerre H
1 - 1 D
66%
Paris FC A
2 - 3 L
77%
Lyon H
0 - 0 D
65%
Brest A
0 - 2 L
61%
Paris SG H
0 - 1 L
79%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Servette A
0 - 2 L
70%
Winterthur A
1 - 2 L
46%
Luzern H
1 - 3 L
56%
Zürich H
3 - 0 W
37%
Sion A
0 - 3 L
66%
Winterthur H
2 - 1 W
38%
Luzern A
0 - 4 L
57%
Young Boys H
0 - 2 L
50%
GC Zürich A
3 - 2 W
32%
Zürich A
2 - 1 W
38%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Le Havre has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 56.9) compared to Lausanne (SoS: 36.8). This means Le Havre's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Le Havre averaging 1.0 and Lausanne averaging 1.2 goals per match.

Le Havre has the defensive edge, conceding 1.5 per match compared to Lausanne's 2.0.

Le Havre has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.9 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Le Havre

Le Havre

VS
Lausanne

Lausanne

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more