Skip to content
Compare Le Havre vs Winterthur

Le Havre vs Winterthur Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Le Havre vs Winterthur: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Le Havre Le Havre Home Team
Winterthur Winterthur Away Team
Le Havre
38.0
L D D D D D L D L L

Last 10 Matches

Winterthur
33.7
L W D L L L L W D D

Categories Won

5

Le Havre

2

Draw

8

Winterthur

Performance Radar

Le Havre
Winterthur

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
0%

0W, 6D, 4L

20%

2W, 3D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-5

-5

-6

-6

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
20%

2 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Samatta (2 goals)
N. Burkart (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 4
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 4
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
56.9

League Difficulty: 86.0, Opponent Quality: 64.2

36.6

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 48.5

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 3 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.16

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.16

1.46

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.06

Adjusted Power Rating
38.0

Attack: 35.6, Defense: 53.4, Form: 0.0

33.7

Attack: 40.4, Defense: 28.9, Form: 17.3

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

4
1

16-30'

1
2

31-45'

4
1

46-60'

3
2

61-75'

1
1

76-90+'

1
Le Havre
Winterthur
Le Havre

Power Rating Breakdown

38.0

Overall

Attack 35.6
Defense 53.4
Form 0.0
Consistency 92.8
Winterthur

Power Rating Breakdown

33.7

Overall

Attack 40.4
Defense 28.9
Form 17.3
Consistency 61.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

86.0 vs 49.0

Opponent Quality

64.2 vs 48.5

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Le Havre logo Le Havre
L
Marseille (61%)
D
Lille (78%)
D
Metz (43%)
D
Angers (52%)
D
Nice (60%)
D
Auxerre (66%)
L
Paris FC (77%)
D
Lyon (65%)
Winterthur logo Winterthur
L
GC Zürich (36%)
W
Lausanne (42%)
D
Zürich (37%)
L
Servette (70%)
L
GC Zürich (27%)
L
Lausanne (43%)
L
Basel (46%)
W
Luzern (57%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Marseille H
0 - 1 L
61%
Lille A
1 - 1 D
78%
Metz H
4 - 4 D
43%
Angers A
1 - 1 D
52%
Nice A
1 - 1 D
60%
Auxerre H
1 - 1 D
66%
Paris FC A
2 - 3 L
77%
Lyon H
0 - 0 D
65%
Brest A
0 - 2 L
61%
Paris SG H
0 - 1 L
79%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
GC Zürich A
2 - 3 L
36%
Lausanne H
2 - 1 W
42%
Zürich H
2 - 2 D
37%
Servette A
3 - 5 L
70%
GC Zürich H
0 - 2 L
27%
Lausanne A
1 - 2 L
43%
Basel H
0 - 2 L
46%
Luzern A
2 - 1 W
57%
Sion A
1 - 1 D
66%
Servette H
1 - 1 D
61%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Le Havre has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 56.9) compared to Winterthur (SoS: 36.6). This means Le Havre's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Winterthur holds the attacking edge with 1.4 goals per match versus Le Havre's 1.0, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Le Havre has the defensive edge, conceding 1.5 per match compared to Winterthur's 2.0.

Le Havre has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Le Havre

Le Havre

VS
Winterthur

Winterthur

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more