Skip to content
Compare Lens vs AGF

Lens vs AGF Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Lens vs AGF: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Lens Lens Home Team
AGF AGF Away Team
Lens
58.8
W D D W W L W L W D

Last 10 Matches

AGF
52.9
W W D D L D W D D W

Categories Won

8

Lens

3

Draw

4

AGF

Performance Radar

Lens
AGF

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 3D, 2L

40%

4W, 5D, 1L

Goals Scored / Match
2.3

23 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+8

+8

+4

+4

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
F. Thauvin (5 goals)
T. Bech (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 14
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
100%

5W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

50%

3W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
50.7

League Difficulty: 77.8, Opponent Quality: 56.0

52.4

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 50.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.54

Actual: 2.3 | Diff: -0.24

1.14

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.06

Adjusted Power Rating
58.8

Attack: 77.2, Defense: 50.4, Form: 50.4

52.9

Attack: 41.0, Defense: 75.1, Form: 41.0

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

2
3

16-30'

2
3

31-45'

2
7

46-60'

2
5

61-75'

2
3

76-90+'

2
Lens
AGF
Lens

Power Rating Breakdown

58.8

Overall

Attack 77.2
Defense 50.4
Form 50.4
Consistency 53.2
AGF

Power Rating Breakdown

52.9

Overall

Attack 41.0
Defense 75.1
Form 41.0
Consistency 63.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

77.8 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

56.0 vs 50.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Lens logo Lens
W
Nantes (51%)
D
Nice (60%)
D
Brest (61%)
W
Toulouse (40%)
W
Toulouse (57%)
L
Lille (78%)
W
Angers (47%)
L
Lorient (69%)
AGF logo AGF
W
Brøndby (49%)
W
Sønderjyske (43%)
D
Midtjylland (52%)
D
Nordsjælland (60%)
L
Midtjylland (57%)
D
Nordsjælland (55%)
W
Viborg (55%)
D
Brøndby (44%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Nantes H
1 - 0 W
51%
Nice A
1 - 1 D
60%
Brest A
3 - 3 D
61%
Toulouse H
4 - 1 W
40%
Toulouse H
3 - 2 W
57%
Lille A
0 - 3 L
78%
Angers H
5 - 1 W
47%
Lorient A
1 - 2 L
69%
Metz H
3 - 0 W
43%
Lyon A
2 - 2 D
54%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Brøndby A
2 - 0 W
49%
Sønderjyske H
2 - 1 W
43%
Midtjylland H
0 - 0 D
52%
Nordsjælland A
1 - 1 D
60%
Midtjylland A
1 - 2 L
57%
Nordsjælland H
1 - 1 D
55%
Viborg A
2 - 1 W
55%
Brøndby H
0 - 0 D
44%
Sønderjyske A
1 - 1 D
48%
Vejle A
2 - 1 W
44%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 50.7 vs 52.4), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Lens's attack is on another level, averaging 2.3 goals per match with F. Thauvin leading the charge with 5 goals. AGF manages just 1.2 per match.

AGF has the defensive edge, conceding 0.8 per match compared to Lens's 1.5.

AGF has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

The home advantage factor favors Lens, who boasts a 100% home win rate. Playing in front of their fans could be the decisive factor.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.9 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Lens has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 5.9 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Lens

Lens

VS
AGF

AGF

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more