Skip to content
Compare Lens vs Pardubice

Lens vs Pardubice Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Lens vs Pardubice: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Lens Lens Home Team
Pardubice Pardubice Away Team
Lens
58.8
W D D W W L W L W D

Last 10 Matches

Pardubice
55.2
L W W W W W L W D L

Categories Won

7

Lens

4

Draw

4

Pardubice

Performance Radar

Lens
Pardubice

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 3D, 2L

60%

6W, 1D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
2.3

23 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+8

+8

+2

+2

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
F. Thauvin (5 goals)
V. Patrák (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 14
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 7
Home Win Rate
100%

5W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

67%

4W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
50.7

League Difficulty: 77.8, Opponent Quality: 56.0

53.6

League Difficulty: 58.0, Opponent Quality: 50.6

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.54

Actual: 2.3 | Diff: -0.24

1.49

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.09

Adjusted Power Rating
58.8

Attack: 77.2, Defense: 50.4, Form: 50.4

55.2

Attack: 48.3, Defense: 62.2, Form: 62.2

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

1
3

16-30'

1
3

31-45'

4
7

46-60'

2
5

61-75'

3
3

76-90+'

3
Lens
Pardubice
Lens

Power Rating Breakdown

58.8

Overall

Attack 77.2
Defense 50.4
Form 50.4
Consistency 53.2
Pardubice

Power Rating Breakdown

55.2

Overall

Attack 48.3
Defense 62.2
Form 62.2
Consistency 43.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

77.8 vs 58.0

Opponent Quality

56.0 vs 50.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Lens logo Lens
W
Nantes (51%)
D
Nice (60%)
D
Brest (61%)
W
Toulouse (40%)
W
Toulouse (57%)
L
Lille (78%)
W
Angers (47%)
L
Lorient (69%)
Pardubice logo Pardubice
L
Karviná (43%)
W
Karviná (48%)
W
Zlín (41%)
W
Plzeň (64%)
W
Olomouc (46%)
W
Dukla (51%)
L
Ml. Boleslav (66%)
W
Karviná (48%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Nantes H
1 - 0 W
51%
Nice A
1 - 1 D
60%
Brest A
3 - 3 D
61%
Toulouse H
4 - 1 W
40%
Toulouse H
3 - 2 W
57%
Lille A
0 - 3 L
78%
Angers H
5 - 1 W
47%
Lorient A
1 - 2 L
69%
Metz H
3 - 0 W
43%
Lyon A
2 - 2 D
54%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Karviná H
1 - 3 L
43%
Karviná A
2 - 1 W
48%
Zlín H
3 - 1 W
41%
Plzeň A
1 - 0 W
64%
Olomouc H
2 - 1 W
46%
Dukla A
2 - 0 W
51%
Ml. Boleslav A
0 - 2 L
66%
Karviná A
2 - 1 W
48%
Teplice H
1 - 1 D
49%
Slovácko A
0 - 2 L
50%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 50.7 vs 53.6), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Lens holds the attacking edge with 2.3 goals per match versus Pardubice's 1.4, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Pardubice has the defensive edge, conceding 1.2 per match compared to Lens's 1.5.

Pardubice has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

The home advantage factor favors Lens, who boasts a 100% home win rate. Playing in front of their fans could be the decisive factor.

Pardubice is a strong road team with a 67% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.2 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Lens

Lens

VS
Pardubice

Pardubice

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more