Skip to content
Compare Lens vs Thun

Lens vs Thun Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Lens vs Thun: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Lens Lens Home Team
Thun Thun Away Team
Lens
58.8
W D D W W L W L W D

Last 10 Matches

Thun
41.4
L L L W L L W W D W

Categories Won

10

Lens

4

Draw

1

Thun

Performance Radar

Lens
Thun

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 3D, 2L

40%

4W, 1D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
2.3

23 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+8

+8

+1

+1

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
F. Thauvin (5 goals)
E. Rastoder (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 14
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
100%

5W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
50.7

League Difficulty: 77.8, Opponent Quality: 56.0

37.5

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 51.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.54

Actual: 2.3 | Diff: -0.24

1.37

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.23

Adjusted Power Rating
58.8

Attack: 77.2, Defense: 50.4, Form: 50.4

41.4

Attack: 46.7, Defense: 43.8, Form: 35.0

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

3

16-30'

3
3

31-45'

4
7

46-60'

4
5

61-75'

3
3

76-90+'

2
Lens
Thun
Lens

Power Rating Breakdown

58.8

Overall

Attack 77.2
Defense 50.4
Form 50.4
Consistency 53.2
Thun

Power Rating Breakdown

41.4

Overall

Attack 46.7
Defense 43.8
Form 35.0
Consistency 39.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

77.8 vs 49.0

Opponent Quality

56.0 vs 51.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Lens logo Lens
W
Nantes (51%)
D
Nice (60%)
D
Brest (61%)
W
Toulouse (40%)
W
Toulouse (57%)
L
Lille (78%)
W
Angers (47%)
L
Lorient (69%)
Thun logo Thun
L
Sion (70%)
L
Basel (55%)
L
Lugano (54%)
W
Basel (50%)
L
Lugano (55%)
L
Zürich (38%)
W
GC Zürich (27%)
W
Young Boys (56%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Nantes H
1 - 0 W
51%
Nice A
1 - 1 D
60%
Brest A
3 - 3 D
61%
Toulouse H
4 - 1 W
40%
Toulouse H
3 - 2 W
57%
Lille A
0 - 3 L
78%
Angers H
5 - 1 W
47%
Lorient A
1 - 2 L
69%
Metz H
3 - 0 W
43%
Lyon A
2 - 2 D
54%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Sion A
0 - 2 L
70%
Basel A
1 - 3 L
55%
Lugano H
0 - 1 L
54%
Basel H
3 - 1 W
50%
Lugano A
0 - 1 L
55%
Zürich A
1 - 2 L
38%
GC Zürich H
5 - 1 W
27%
Young Boys A
2 - 1 W
56%
St.Gallen H
2 - 2 D
55%
Luzern H
2 - 1 W
52%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Lens has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 50.7) compared to Thun (SoS: 37.5). This means Lens's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Lens holds the attacking edge with 2.3 goals per match versus Thun's 1.6, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Lens conceding 1.5 and Thun conceding 1.5 per match.

The home advantage factor favors Lens, who boasts a 100% home win rate. Playing in front of their fans could be the decisive factor.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.5 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Lens emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (58.8 vs 41.4) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Lens

Lens

VS
Thun

Thun

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more