Compare Levadiakos vs Brann

Levadiakos vs Brann Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Levadiakos vs Brann: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Levadiakos Home Team

Brann Away Team

Levadiakos

39.5

W W L D W L L L L D

Last 10 Matches

Brann

45.1

W W D L L W L L L L

Categories Won

Levadiakos

Draw

Brann

Performance Radar

Levadiakos

Brann

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

30%

3W, 2D, 5L

30%

3W, 1D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match

1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-6

Clean Sheet

30%

3 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

30%

3 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

F. Pedrozo (3 goals)

K. Ingason (4 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 8

1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 9

Home Win Rate

40%

2W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate

20%

1W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

54.0

League Difficulty: 56.0, Opponent Quality: 52.7

42.3

League Difficulty: 57.0, Opponent Quality: 55.6

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 0 matches

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.21

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: -0.11

2.14

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.24

Adjusted Power Rating

39.5

Attack: 38.1, Defense: 45.1, Form: 31.2

45.1

Attack: 58.5, Defense: 49.2, Form: 27.7

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Levadiakos

Brann

Power Rating Breakdown

39.5

Overall

Attack 38.1

Defense 45.1

Form 31.2

Consistency 49.3

Power Rating Breakdown

45.1

Overall

Attack 58.5

Defense 49.2

Form 27.7

Consistency 46.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

56.0 vs 57.0

Opponent Quality

52.7 vs 55.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Levadiakos

Brann

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Volos A

Greek Super League

3 - 0 W

44%

Volos H

Greek Super League

5 - 2 W

39%

OFI A

Greek Super League

0 - 2 L

49%

Aris H

Greek Super League

1 - 1 D

53%

Atromitos H

Greek Super League

1 - 0 W

54%

PAOK A

Greek Super League

0 - 3 L

59%

Panathinaikos H

Greek Super League

1 - 4 L

52%

Kifisia A

Greek Super League

0 - 1 L

54%

AEK Athens A

Greek Super League

0 - 4 L

67%

Olympiakos H

Greek Super League

0 - 0 D

56%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Fredrikstad H

Norwegian Eliteserien

3 - 1 W

39%

Tromsø A

Norwegian Eliteserien

5 - 0 W

68%

Rosenborg A

Norwegian Eliteserien

1 - 1 D

46%

Viking A

Norwegian Eliteserien

2 - 3 L

70%

Sandefjord H

Norwegian Eliteserien

0 - 1 L

50%

HamKam A

Norwegian Eliteserien

5 - 1 W

55%

Tromsø H

Norwegian Eliteserien

1 - 2 L

63%

Kristiansund A

Norwegian Eliteserien

2 - 3 L

48%

Bologna A

UEFA Europa League

0 - 1 L

61%

Bologna H

UEFA Europa League

0 - 1 L

56%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Levadiakos has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 54.0) compared to Brann (SoS: 42.3). This means Levadiakos's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Brann holds the attacking edge with 1.9 goals per match versus Levadiakos's 1.1, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Brann has the defensive edge, conceding 1.4 per match compared to Levadiakos's 1.7.

Levadiakos has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Brann has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 5.6 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Levadiakos

Brann

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair