Skip to content
Compare LNZ Cherkasy vs Go Ahead

LNZ Cherkasy vs Go Ahead Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare LNZ Cherkasy vs Go Ahead: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

LNZ Cherkasy LNZ Cherkasy Home Team
Go Ahead Go Ahead Away Team
LNZ Cherkasy
60.7
D D D L D W W W W L

Last 10 Matches

Go Ahead
56.1
L D D D W L W L W W

Categories Won

6

LNZ Cherkasy

2

Draw

7

Go Ahead

Performance Radar

LNZ Cherkasy
Go Ahead

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 4D, 2L

40%

4W, 3D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+6

+6

+8

+8

Clean Sheet
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Assinor (3 goals)
J. Breum (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 10
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 12
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

50%

3W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
67.6

League Difficulty: 98.0, Opponent Quality: 71.2

53.2

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 60.7

Elite Opponent Record
14%

1W / 7 matches

0%

0W / 3 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.53

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.13

2.0

Actual: 2.0 | Diff: 0.0

Adjusted Power Rating
60.7

Attack: 54.9, Defense: 86.2, Form: 47.0

56.1

Attack: 68.8, Defense: 61.9, Form: 41.3

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

4
1

16-30'

2
2

31-45'

2
3

46-60'

5
3

61-75'

4
5

76-90+'

3
LNZ Cherkasy
Go Ahead
LNZ Cherkasy

Power Rating Breakdown

60.7

Overall

Attack 54.9
Defense 86.2
Form 47.0
Consistency 56.8
Go Ahead

Power Rating Breakdown

56.1

Overall

Attack 68.8
Defense 61.9
Form 41.3
Consistency 50.5

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

98.0 vs 80.0

Opponent Quality

71.2 vs 60.7

Elite Opponent Record

14% vs 0%
LNZ Cherkasy logo LNZ Cherkasy
D
Dynamo Kyiv (78%)
D
Karpaty Lviv (86%)
D
Metalist 1925 (74%)
L
Kolos (83%)
D
Shakhtar D (78%)
W
Kryvbas KR (76%)
W
Rukh Vynnyky (49%)
W
Oleksandria (44%)
Go Ahead logo Go Ahead
L
PSV (75%)
D
Sparta (49%)
D
AZ (67%)
D
Groningen (66%)
W
Zwolle (54%)
L
Utrecht (75%)
W
NAC (49%)
L
Twente (76%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Dynamo Kyiv H
0 - 0 D
78%
Karpaty Lviv A
0 - 0 D
86%
Metalist 1925 H
1 - 1 D
74%
Kolos A
0 - 1 L
83%
Shakhtar D H
2 - 2 D
78%
Kryvbas KR A
3 - 0 W
76%
Rukh Vynnyky A
2 - 1 W
49%
Oleksandria H
2 - 0 W
44%
Veres Rivne A
3 - 0 W
67%
Polissya H
1 - 3 L
77%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
PSV H
1 - 4 L
75%
Sparta A
2 - 2 D
49%
AZ H
0 - 0 D
67%
Groningen A
0 - 0 D
66%
Zwolle H
5 - 0 W
54%
Utrecht A
0 - 2 L
75%
NAC H
6 - 0 W
49%
Twente H
1 - 4 L
76%
Excelsior A
1 - 0 W
60%
Heracles H
4 - 0 W
36%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

LNZ Cherkasy has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 67.6) compared to Go Ahead (SoS: 53.2). This means LNZ Cherkasy's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Go Ahead holds the attacking edge with 2.0 goals per match versus LNZ Cherkasy's 1.4, though the gap is not insurmountable.

LNZ Cherkasy has the defensive edge, conceding 0.8 per match compared to Go Ahead's 1.2.

LNZ Cherkasy has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 7 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Go Ahead has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

LNZ Cherkasy is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.7 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being unlikely.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

LNZ Cherkasy

LNZ Cherkasy

VS
Go Ahead

Go Ahead

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more