Skip to content
Compare Lorient vs Cremonese

Lorient vs Cremonese Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Lorient vs Cremonese: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Lorient Lorient Home Team
Cremonese Cremonese Away Team
Lorient
51.4
W D L W L D L W D D

Last 10 Matches

Cremonese
36.5
W L L D L L W L L L

Categories Won

10

Lorient

3

Draw

2

Cremonese

Performance Radar

Lorient
Cremonese

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 4D, 3L

20%

2W, 1D, 7L

Goals Scored / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

0.9

9 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+3

+3

-8

-8

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
B. Dieng (4 goals)
F. Bonazzoli (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 7
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
60.2

League Difficulty: 81.9, Opponent Quality: 64.0

57.7

League Difficulty: 90.0, Opponent Quality: 62.0

Elite Opponent Record
20%

1W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.78

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.38

1.12

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: -0.22

Adjusted Power Rating
51.4

Attack: 51.4, Defense: 69.8, Form: 33.1

36.5

Attack: 32.3, Defense: 46.7, Form: 21.5

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

4

16-30'

1

31-45'

1
3

46-60'

4
1

61-75'

1
5

76-90+'

2
Lorient
Cremonese
Lorient

Power Rating Breakdown

51.4

Overall

Attack 51.4
Defense 69.8
Form 33.1
Consistency 57.7
Cremonese

Power Rating Breakdown

36.5

Overall

Attack 32.3
Defense 46.7
Form 21.5
Consistency 57.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

81.9 vs 90.0

Opponent Quality

64.0 vs 62.0

Elite Opponent Record

20% vs 0%
Lorient logo Lorient
W
Metz (48%)
D
Paris SG (84%)
L
Strasbourg (55%)
W
Marseille (61%)
L
Lyon (70%)
D
Paris FC (72%)
L
Toulouse (62%)
W
Lens (71%)
Cremonese logo Cremonese
W
Pisa (40%)
L
Lazio (70%)
L
Napoli (79%)
D
Torino (69%)
L
Cagliari (58%)
L
Bologna (58%)
W
Parma (62%)
L
Fiorentina (66%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Metz A
4 - 0 W
48%
Paris SG A
2 - 2 D
84%
Strasbourg H
2 - 3 L
55%
Marseille H
2 - 0 W
61%
Lyon A
0 - 2 L
70%
Paris FC H
1 - 1 D
72%
Toulouse A
0 - 1 L
62%
Lens H
2 - 1 W
71%
Lille A
1 - 1 D
78%
Nice H
0 - 0 D
39%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Pisa H
3 - 0 W
40%
Lazio H
1 - 2 L
70%
Napoli A
0 - 4 L
79%
Torino H
0 - 0 D
69%
Cagliari A
0 - 1 L
58%
Bologna H
1 - 2 L
58%
Parma A
2 - 0 W
62%
Fiorentina H
1 - 4 L
66%
Lecce A
1 - 2 L
58%
AC Milan H
0 - 2 L
60%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 60.2 vs 57.7), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Lorient holds the attacking edge with 1.4 goals per match versus Cremonese's 0.9, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Lorient has the defensive edge, conceding 1.1 per match compared to Cremonese's 1.7.

Lorient has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 5 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.5 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Lorient has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 14.9 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Lorient

Lorient

VS
Cremonese

Cremonese

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more