Skip to content
Compare Lorient vs Go Ahead

Lorient vs Go Ahead Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Lorient vs Go Ahead: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Lorient Lorient Home Team
Go Ahead Go Ahead Away Team
Lorient
51.4
W D L W L D L W D D

Last 10 Matches

Go Ahead
56.1
L D D D W L W L W W

Categories Won

4

Lorient

1

Draw

10

Go Ahead

Performance Radar

Lorient
Go Ahead

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 4D, 3L

40%

4W, 3D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+3

+3

+8

+8

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
B. Dieng (4 goals)
J. Breum (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 12
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

50%

3W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
60.2

League Difficulty: 81.9, Opponent Quality: 64.0

53.2

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 60.7

Elite Opponent Record
20%

1W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 3 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.78

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.38

2.0

Actual: 2.0 | Diff: 0.0

Adjusted Power Rating
51.4

Attack: 51.4, Defense: 69.8, Form: 33.1

56.1

Attack: 68.8, Defense: 61.9, Form: 41.3

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

4
4

16-30'

2

31-45'

2
3

46-60'

5
1

61-75'

4
5

76-90+'

3
Lorient
Go Ahead
Lorient

Power Rating Breakdown

51.4

Overall

Attack 51.4
Defense 69.8
Form 33.1
Consistency 57.7
Go Ahead

Power Rating Breakdown

56.1

Overall

Attack 68.8
Defense 61.9
Form 41.3
Consistency 50.5

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

81.9 vs 80.0

Opponent Quality

64.0 vs 60.7

Elite Opponent Record

20% vs 0%
Lorient logo Lorient
W
Metz (48%)
D
Paris SG (84%)
L
Strasbourg (55%)
W
Marseille (61%)
L
Lyon (70%)
D
Paris FC (72%)
L
Toulouse (62%)
W
Lens (71%)
Go Ahead logo Go Ahead
L
PSV (75%)
D
Sparta (49%)
D
AZ (67%)
D
Groningen (66%)
W
Zwolle (54%)
L
Utrecht (75%)
W
NAC (49%)
L
Twente (76%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Metz A
4 - 0 W
48%
Paris SG A
2 - 2 D
84%
Strasbourg H
2 - 3 L
55%
Marseille H
2 - 0 W
61%
Lyon A
0 - 2 L
70%
Paris FC H
1 - 1 D
72%
Toulouse A
0 - 1 L
62%
Lens H
2 - 1 W
71%
Lille A
1 - 1 D
78%
Nice H
0 - 0 D
39%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
PSV H
1 - 4 L
75%
Sparta A
2 - 2 D
49%
AZ H
0 - 0 D
67%
Groningen A
0 - 0 D
66%
Zwolle H
5 - 0 W
54%
Utrecht A
0 - 2 L
75%
NAC H
6 - 0 W
49%
Twente H
1 - 4 L
76%
Excelsior A
1 - 0 W
60%
Heracles H
4 - 0 W
36%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 60.2 vs 53.2), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Go Ahead holds the attacking edge with 2.0 goals per match versus Lorient's 1.4, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Lorient conceding 1.1 and Go Ahead conceding 1.2 per match.

Lorient has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 5 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Go Ahead has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.9 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Lorient

Lorient

VS
Go Ahead

Go Ahead

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more