Skip to content
Compare Malmö vs Cremonese

Malmö vs Cremonese Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Malmö vs Cremonese: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Malmö Malmö Home Team
Cremonese Cremonese Away Team
Malmö
39.9
L L W L W W D L L L

Last 10 Matches

Cremonese
36.5
W L L D L L W L L L

Categories Won

9

Malmö

3

Draw

3

Cremonese

Performance Radar

Malmö
Cremonese

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 1D, 6L

20%

2W, 1D, 7L

Goals Scored / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

0.9

9 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-2

-2

-8

-8

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
S. Hakšabanović (3 goals)
F. Bonazzoli (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 7
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
45.2

League Difficulty: 60.5, Opponent Quality: 60.1

57.7

League Difficulty: 90.0, Opponent Quality: 62.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 3 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.44

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.04

1.12

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: -0.22

Adjusted Power Rating
39.9

Attack: 44.4, Defense: 44.4, Form: 28.6

36.5

Attack: 32.3, Defense: 46.7, Form: 21.5

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

3

16-30'

1
3

31-45'

1
2

46-60'

4
2

61-75'

1
3

76-90+'

2
Malmö
Cremonese
Malmö

Power Rating Breakdown

39.9

Overall

Attack 44.4
Defense 44.4
Form 28.6
Consistency 46.0
Cremonese

Power Rating Breakdown

36.5

Overall

Attack 32.3
Defense 46.7
Form 21.5
Consistency 57.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

60.5 vs 90.0

Opponent Quality

60.1 vs 62.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Malmö logo Malmö
L
Häcken (58%)
L
Mjällby (54%)
W
AIK (49%)
L
Sirius (65%)
W
Djurgården (59%)
W
GAIS (47%)
D
Örgryte (41%)
L
Genk (70%)
Cremonese logo Cremonese
W
Pisa (40%)
L
Lazio (70%)
L
Napoli (79%)
D
Torino (69%)
L
Cagliari (58%)
L
Bologna (58%)
W
Parma (62%)
L
Fiorentina (66%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Häcken A
2 - 3 L
58%
Mjällby H
2 - 3 L
54%
AIK A
1 - 0 W
49%
Sirius H
2 - 3 L
65%
Djurgården A
1 - 0 W
59%
GAIS H
3 - 1 W
47%
Örgryte A
1 - 1 D
41%
Genk A
1 - 2 L
70%
Red Star H
0 - 1 L
81%
Porto A
1 - 2 L
77%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Pisa H
3 - 0 W
40%
Lazio H
1 - 2 L
70%
Napoli A
0 - 4 L
79%
Torino H
0 - 0 D
69%
Cagliari A
0 - 1 L
58%
Bologna H
1 - 2 L
58%
Parma A
2 - 0 W
62%
Fiorentina H
1 - 4 L
66%
Lecce A
1 - 2 L
58%
AC Milan H
0 - 2 L
60%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Cremonese has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 57.7) compared to Malmö (SoS: 45.2). This means Cremonese's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Malmö holds the attacking edge with 1.4 goals per match versus Cremonese's 0.9, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Malmö conceding 1.6 and Cremonese conceding 1.7 per match.

Malmö has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Malmö

Malmö

VS
Cremonese

Cremonese

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more