Skip to content
Compare Malmö vs Lausanne

Malmö vs Lausanne Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Malmö vs Lausanne: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Malmö Malmö Home Team
Lausanne Lausanne Away Team
Malmö
39.9
L L W L W W D L L L

Last 10 Matches

Lausanne
33.3
L L L W L W L L W W

Categories Won

8

Malmö

4

Draw

3

Lausanne

Performance Radar

Malmö
Lausanne

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 1D, 6L

40%

4W, 0D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-2

-2

-8

-8

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
S. Hakšabanović (3 goals)
Omar Janneh (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 5
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
45.2

League Difficulty: 60.5, Opponent Quality: 60.1

36.8

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 49.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 3 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.44

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.04

1.05

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.15

Adjusted Power Rating
39.9

Attack: 44.4, Defense: 44.4, Form: 28.6

33.3

Attack: 34.7, Defense: 28.9, Form: 34.7

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1
3

16-30'

3
3

31-45'

2
2

46-60'

3
2

61-75'

2
3

76-90+'

1
Malmö
Lausanne
Malmö

Power Rating Breakdown

39.9

Overall

Attack 44.4
Defense 44.4
Form 28.6
Consistency 46.0
Lausanne

Power Rating Breakdown

33.3

Overall

Attack 34.7
Defense 28.9
Form 34.7
Consistency 35.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

60.5 vs 49.0

Opponent Quality

60.1 vs 49.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Malmö logo Malmö
L
Häcken (58%)
L
Mjällby (54%)
W
AIK (49%)
L
Sirius (65%)
W
Djurgården (59%)
W
GAIS (47%)
D
Örgryte (41%)
L
Genk (70%)
Lausanne logo Lausanne
L
Servette (70%)
L
Winterthur (46%)
L
Luzern (56%)
W
Zürich (37%)
L
Sion (66%)
W
Winterthur (38%)
L
Luzern (57%)
L
Young Boys (50%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Häcken A
2 - 3 L
58%
Mjällby H
2 - 3 L
54%
AIK A
1 - 0 W
49%
Sirius H
2 - 3 L
65%
Djurgården A
1 - 0 W
59%
GAIS H
3 - 1 W
47%
Örgryte A
1 - 1 D
41%
Genk A
1 - 2 L
70%
Red Star H
0 - 1 L
81%
Porto A
1 - 2 L
77%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Servette A
0 - 2 L
70%
Winterthur A
1 - 2 L
46%
Luzern H
1 - 3 L
56%
Zürich H
3 - 0 W
37%
Sion A
0 - 3 L
66%
Winterthur H
2 - 1 W
38%
Luzern A
0 - 4 L
57%
Young Boys H
0 - 2 L
50%
GC Zürich A
3 - 2 W
32%
Zürich A
2 - 1 W
38%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 45.2 vs 36.8), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Malmö averaging 1.4 and Lausanne averaging 1.2 goals per match.

Malmö has the defensive edge, conceding 1.6 per match compared to Lausanne's 2.0.

Malmö has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.1 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Malmö has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 6.6 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Malmö

Malmö

VS
Lausanne

Lausanne

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more