Skip to content
Compare Malmö vs Slaven

Malmö vs Slaven Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Malmö vs Slaven: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Malmö Malmö Home Team
Slaven Slaven Away Team
Malmö
39.9
L L W L W W D L L L

Last 10 Matches

Slaven
31.9
W L D L D L L D L D

Categories Won

9

Malmö

5

Draw

1

Slaven

Performance Radar

Malmö
Slaven

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 1D, 6L

10%

1W, 4D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-2

-2

-7

-7

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
S. Hakšabanović (3 goals)
M. Dabro (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
45.2

League Difficulty: 60.5, Opponent Quality: 60.1

35.1

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 48.8

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 3 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.44

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.04

1.04

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.16

Adjusted Power Rating
39.9

Attack: 44.4, Defense: 44.4, Form: 28.6

31.9

Attack: 34.0, Defense: 31.2, Form: 8.5

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1
3

16-30'

3

31-45'

5
2

46-60'

3
2

61-75'

2
3

76-90+'

1
Malmö
Slaven
Malmö

Power Rating Breakdown

39.9

Overall

Attack 44.4
Defense 44.4
Form 28.6
Consistency 46.0
Slaven

Power Rating Breakdown

31.9

Overall

Attack 34.0
Defense 31.2
Form 8.5
Consistency 75.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

60.5 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

60.1 vs 48.8

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Malmö logo Malmö
L
Häcken (58%)
L
Mjällby (54%)
W
AIK (49%)
L
Sirius (65%)
W
Djurgården (59%)
W
GAIS (47%)
D
Örgryte (41%)
L
Genk (70%)
Slaven logo Slaven
W
Gorica (44%)
L
Istra (46%)
D
Vukovar (32%)
L
Lokomotiva (49%)
D
Hajduk (53%)
L
Varaždin (54%)
L
Rijeka (44%)
D
Osijek (40%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Häcken A
2 - 3 L
58%
Mjällby H
2 - 3 L
54%
AIK A
1 - 0 W
49%
Sirius H
2 - 3 L
65%
Djurgården A
1 - 0 W
59%
GAIS H
3 - 1 W
47%
Örgryte A
1 - 1 D
41%
Genk A
1 - 2 L
70%
Red Star H
0 - 1 L
81%
Porto A
1 - 2 L
77%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Gorica H
1 - 0 W
44%
Istra A
1 - 3 L
46%
Vukovar H
2 - 2 D
32%
Lokomotiva A
1 - 2 L
49%
Hajduk H
2 - 2 D
53%
Varaždin A
1 - 2 L
54%
Rijeka H
0 - 2 L
44%
Osijek H
0 - 0 D
40%
Dinamo Zagreb A
2 - 4 L
76%
Gorica A
2 - 2 D
50%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Malmö has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 45.2) compared to Slaven (SoS: 35.1). This means Malmö's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Malmö averaging 1.4 and Slaven averaging 1.2 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with Malmö conceding 1.6 and Slaven conceding 1.9 per match.

Malmö has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Malmö has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 8.0 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Malmö

Malmö

VS
Slaven

Slaven

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more