Skip to content
Compare Malmö vs Winterthur

Malmö vs Winterthur Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Malmö vs Winterthur: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Malmö Malmö Home Team
Winterthur Winterthur Away Team
Malmö
39.9
L L W L W W D L L L

Last 10 Matches

Winterthur
37.1
W D L L L L W D D L

Categories Won

9

Malmö

3

Draw

3

Winterthur

Performance Radar

Malmö
Winterthur

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 1D, 6L

20%

2W, 3D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-2

-2

-6

-6

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
S. Hakšabanović (3 goals)
N. Burkart (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 4
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
45.2

League Difficulty: 60.5, Opponent Quality: 60.1

49.1

League Difficulty: 48.0, Opponent Quality: 49.8

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 3 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.44

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.04

1.36

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: -0.06

Adjusted Power Rating
39.9

Attack: 44.4, Defense: 44.4, Form: 28.6

37.1

Attack: 42.9, Defense: 36.3, Form: 19.8

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

2
3

16-30'

2
3

31-45'

4
2

46-60'

3
2

61-75'

1
3

76-90+'

1
Malmö
Winterthur
Malmö

Power Rating Breakdown

39.9

Overall

Attack 44.4
Defense 44.4
Form 28.6
Consistency 46.0
Winterthur

Power Rating Breakdown

37.1

Overall

Attack 42.9
Defense 36.3
Form 19.8
Consistency 61.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

60.5 vs 48.0

Opponent Quality

60.1 vs 49.8

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Malmö logo Malmö
L
Häcken (58%)
L
Mjällby (54%)
W
AIK (49%)
L
Sirius (65%)
W
Djurgården (59%)
W
GAIS (47%)
D
Örgryte (41%)
L
Genk (70%)
Winterthur logo Winterthur
W
Lausanne (42%)
D
Zürich (36%)
L
Servette (67%)
L
GC Zürich (27%)
L
Lausanne (44%)
L
Basel (46%)
W
Luzern (52%)
D
Sion (66%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Häcken A
2 - 3 L
58%
Mjällby H
2 - 3 L
54%
AIK A
1 - 0 W
49%
Sirius H
2 - 3 L
65%
Djurgården A
1 - 0 W
59%
GAIS H
3 - 1 W
47%
Örgryte A
1 - 1 D
41%
Genk A
1 - 2 L
70%
Red Star H
0 - 1 L
81%
Porto A
1 - 2 L
77%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Lausanne H
2 - 1 W
42%
Zürich H
2 - 2 D
36%
Servette A
3 - 5 L
67%
GC Zürich H
0 - 2 L
27%
Lausanne A
1 - 2 L
44%
Basel H
0 - 2 L
46%
Luzern A
2 - 1 W
52%
Sion A
1 - 1 D
66%
Servette H
1 - 1 D
58%
St.Gallen A
1 - 2 L
60%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 45.2 vs 49.1), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Malmö averaging 1.4 and Winterthur averaging 1.3 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with Malmö conceding 1.6 and Winterthur conceding 1.9 per match.

Malmö has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Winterthur has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.1 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by the day's form, tactical adjustments, and perhaps a moment of individual brilliance.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Malmö

Malmö

VS
Winterthur

Winterthur

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more