Compare Malmö vs WAC

Malmö vs WAC Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Malmö vs WAC: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Malmö Home Team

WAC Away Team

Malmö

39.9

L L W L W W D L L L

Last 10 Matches

WAC

41.5

W W W L D D L D L L

Categories Won

Malmö

Draw

WAC

Performance Radar

Malmö

WAC

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

30%

3W, 1D, 6L

30%

3W, 3D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match

1.4

14 / 10 matches

0.9

9 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-2

-4

Clean Sheet

20%

2 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

60%

6 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

70%

7 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

S. Hakšabanović (3 goals)

D. Baumgartner (2 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 7

1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 3

Home Win Rate

25%

1W / 4 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate

33%

2W / 6 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

45.2

League Difficulty: 60.5, Opponent Quality: 60.1

54.3

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 53.9

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 3 matches

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.44

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.04

0.97

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: -0.07

Adjusted Power Rating

39.9

Attack: 44.4, Defense: 44.4, Form: 28.6

41.5

Attack: 31.3, Defense: 59.1, Form: 31.3

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Malmö

WAC

Power Rating Breakdown

39.9

Overall

Attack 44.4

Defense 44.4

Form 28.6

Consistency 46.0

Power Rating Breakdown

41.5

Overall

Attack 31.3

Defense 59.1

Form 31.3

Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

60.5 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

60.1 vs 53.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Malmö

WAC

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Häcken A

Swedish Allsvenskan

2 - 3 L

58%

Mjällby H

Swedish Allsvenskan

2 - 3 L

54%

AIK A

Swedish Allsvenskan

1 - 0 W

49%

Sirius H

Swedish Allsvenskan

2 - 3 L

65%

Djurgården A

Swedish Allsvenskan

1 - 0 W

59%

GAIS H

Swedish Allsvenskan

3 - 1 W

47%

Örgryte A

Swedish Allsvenskan

1 - 1 D

41%

Genk A

UEFA Europa League

1 - 2 L

70%

Red Star H

UEFA Europa League

0 - 1 L

81%

Porto A

UEFA Europa League

1 - 2 L

77%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Ried A

Austrian Bundesliga

1 - 0 W

55%

Altach A

Austrian Bundesliga

4 - 1 W

48%

GAK H

Austrian Bundesliga

1 - 0 W

53%

BW Linz A

Austrian Bundesliga

0 - 3 L

60%

BW Linz H

Austrian Bundesliga

0 - 0 D

55%

Ried H

Austrian Bundesliga

0 - 0 D

50%

WSG Tirol A

Austrian Bundesliga

1 - 3 L

48%

Altach H

Austrian Bundesliga

1 - 1 D

43%

GAK A

Austrian Bundesliga

0 - 2 L

58%

LASK A

Austrian Bundesliga

1 - 3 L

69%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 45.2 vs 54.3), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Malmö holds the attacking edge with 1.4 goals per match versus WAC's 0.9, though the gap is not insurmountable.

WAC has the defensive edge, conceding 1.3 per match compared to Malmö's 1.6.

Malmö has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

WAC has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.6 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by the day's form, tactical adjustments, and perhaps a moment of individual brilliance.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Malmö

WAC

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair