Skip to content
Compare Malmö vs Zlín

Malmö vs Zlín Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Malmö vs Zlín: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Malmö Malmö Home Team
Zlín Zlín Away Team
Malmö
39.9
L L W L W W D L L L

Last 10 Matches

Zlín
37.7
L D W L W L L L L W

Categories Won

5

Malmö

3

Draw

7

Zlín

Performance Radar

Malmö
Zlín

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 1D, 6L

30%

3W, 1D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

2.5

25 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-2

-2

-9

-9

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

90%

9 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
S. Hakšabanović (3 goals)
T. Poznar (6 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

50%

3W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

0%

0W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
45.2

League Difficulty: 60.5, Opponent Quality: 60.1

55.7

League Difficulty: 58.0, Opponent Quality: 54.1

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 3 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.44

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.04

1.65

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: -0.05

Adjusted Power Rating
39.9

Attack: 44.4, Defense: 44.4, Form: 28.6

37.7

Attack: 56.4, Defense: 17.6, Form: 31.7

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

3
3

16-30'

1
3

31-45'

4
2

46-60'

1
2

61-75'

3
3

76-90+'

4
Malmö
Zlín
Malmö

Power Rating Breakdown

39.9

Overall

Attack 44.4
Defense 44.4
Form 28.6
Consistency 46.0
Zlín

Power Rating Breakdown

37.7

Overall

Attack 56.4
Defense 17.6
Form 31.7
Consistency 46.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

60.5 vs 58.0

Opponent Quality

60.1 vs 54.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Malmö logo Malmö
L
Häcken (58%)
L
Mjällby (54%)
W
AIK (49%)
L
Sirius (65%)
W
Djurgården (59%)
W
GAIS (47%)
D
Örgryte (41%)
L
Genk (70%)
Zlín logo Zlín
L
Teplice (49%)
D
Ml. Boleslav (66%)
W
Dukla (46%)
L
Pardubice (62%)
W
Teplice (49%)
L
Bohemians (58%)
L
Jablonec (44%)
L
Slavia Prague (69%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Häcken A
2 - 3 L
58%
Mjällby H
2 - 3 L
54%
AIK A
1 - 0 W
49%
Sirius H
2 - 3 L
65%
Djurgården A
1 - 0 W
59%
GAIS H
3 - 1 W
47%
Örgryte A
1 - 1 D
41%
Genk A
1 - 2 L
70%
Red Star H
0 - 1 L
81%
Porto A
1 - 2 L
77%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Teplice H
2 - 4 L
49%
Ml. Boleslav A
1 - 1 D
66%
Dukla H
2 - 1 W
46%
Pardubice A
1 - 3 L
62%
Teplice H
3 - 2 W
49%
Bohemians A
1 - 2 L
58%
Jablonec H
0 - 3 L
44%
Slavia Prague H
1 - 3 L
69%
Ostrava A
2 - 6 L
39%
Plzeň H
3 - 0 W
59%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Zlín has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 55.7) compared to Malmö (SoS: 45.2). This means Zlín's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Malmö averaging 1.4 and Zlín averaging 1.6 goals per match.

Defensively, Malmö is far superior, conceding just 1.6 goals per match with 2 clean sheets, while Zlín leaks 2.5 per match.

Malmö has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Zlín has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.5 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by the day's form, tactical adjustments, and perhaps a moment of individual brilliance.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Malmö

Malmö

VS
Zlín

Zlín

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more