Compare Marseille vs Angers

Marseille vs Angers Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Marseille vs Angers: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Marseille Home Team

Angers Away Team

Marseille

45.3

W L D L W L L W W D

Last 10 Matches

Angers

30.8

D L L D L D L L W L

Categories Won

Marseille

Draw

Angers

Performance Radar

Marseille

Angers

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

40%

4W, 2D, 4L

10%

1W, 3D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match

1.1

11 / 10 matches

0.6

6 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-2

-13

Clean Sheet

30%

3 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

50%

5 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

M. Greenwood (3 goals)

P. Peter (2 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 7

1st Half: 1 / 2nd Half: 5

Home Win Rate

40%

2W / 5 matches

0W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

40%

2W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

53.7

League Difficulty: 81.9, Opponent Quality: 59.9

57.7

League Difficulty: 86.0, Opponent Quality: 66.7

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 2 matches

0W / 5 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.17

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: -0.07

0.6

Actual: 0.6 | Diff: 0.0

Adjusted Power Rating

45.3

Attack: 38.0, Defense: 58.8, Form: 41.5

30.8

Attack: 21.5, Defense: 39.5, Form: 10.8

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Marseille

Angers

Power Rating Breakdown

45.3

Overall

Attack 38.0

Defense 58.8

Form 41.5

Consistency 44.8

Power Rating Breakdown

30.8

Overall

Attack 21.5

Defense 39.5

Form 10.8

Consistency 74.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

81.9 vs 86.0

Opponent Quality

59.9 vs 66.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Marseille

Angers

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Le Havre A

French Ligue 1

1 - 0 W

58%

Nantes A

French Ligue 1

0 - 3 L

56%

Nice H

French Ligue 1

1 - 1 D

55%

Lorient A

French Ligue 1

0 - 2 L

69%

Metz H

French Ligue 1

3 - 1 W

43%

Monaco A

French Ligue 1

1 - 2 L

77%

Lille H

French Ligue 1

1 - 2 L

73%

Auxerre H

French Ligue 1

1 - 0 W

66%

Toulouse A

French Ligue 1

1 - 0 W

62%

Toulouse H

Coupe de France

2 - 2 D

40%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Strasbourg H

French Ligue 1

1 - 1 D

55%

Auxerre A

French Ligue 1

1 - 3 L

71%

Paris SG H

French Ligue 1

0 - 3 L

79%

Le Havre H

French Ligue 1

1 - 1 D

53%

Rennes A

French Ligue 1

1 - 2 L

80%

Lyon H

French Ligue 1

0 - 0 D

65%

Lens A

French Ligue 1

1 - 5 L

76%

Nice H

French Ligue 1

0 - 2 L

55%

Nantes A

French Ligue 1

1 - 0 W

56%

Monaco A

French Ligue 1

0 - 2 L

77%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 53.7 vs 57.7), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Marseille holds the attacking edge with 1.1 goals per match versus Angers's 0.6, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Marseille has the defensive edge, conceding 1.3 per match compared to Angers's 1.9.

Angers has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 5 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.5 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Marseille has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 14.5 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Marseille

Angers

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair