Compare Marseille vs Brann

Marseille vs Brann Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Marseille vs Brann: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Marseille Home Team

Brann Away Team

Marseille

45.3

W L D L W L L W W D

Last 10 Matches

Brann

45.1

W W D L L W L L L L

Categories Won

Marseille

Draw

Brann

Performance Radar

Marseille

Brann

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

40%

4W, 2D, 4L

30%

3W, 1D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match

1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-2

Clean Sheet

30%

3 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

M. Greenwood (3 goals)

K. Ingason (4 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 7

1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 9

Home Win Rate

40%

2W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate

40%

2W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

53.7

League Difficulty: 81.9, Opponent Quality: 59.9

42.3

League Difficulty: 57.0, Opponent Quality: 55.6

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 2 matches

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.17

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: -0.07

2.14

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.24

Adjusted Power Rating

45.3

Attack: 38.0, Defense: 58.8, Form: 41.5

45.1

Attack: 58.5, Defense: 49.2, Form: 27.7

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Marseille

Brann

Power Rating Breakdown

45.3

Overall

Attack 38.0

Defense 58.8

Form 41.5

Consistency 44.8

Power Rating Breakdown

45.1

Overall

Attack 58.5

Defense 49.2

Form 27.7

Consistency 46.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

81.9 vs 57.0

Opponent Quality

59.9 vs 55.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Marseille

Brann

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Le Havre A

French Ligue 1

1 - 0 W

58%

Nantes A

French Ligue 1

0 - 3 L

56%

Nice H

French Ligue 1

1 - 1 D

55%

Lorient A

French Ligue 1

0 - 2 L

69%

Metz H

French Ligue 1

3 - 1 W

43%

Monaco A

French Ligue 1

1 - 2 L

77%

Lille H

French Ligue 1

1 - 2 L

73%

Auxerre H

French Ligue 1

1 - 0 W

66%

Toulouse A

French Ligue 1

1 - 0 W

62%

Toulouse H

Coupe de France

2 - 2 D

40%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Fredrikstad H

Norwegian Eliteserien

3 - 1 W

39%

Tromsø A

Norwegian Eliteserien

5 - 0 W

68%

Rosenborg A

Norwegian Eliteserien

1 - 1 D

46%

Viking A

Norwegian Eliteserien

2 - 3 L

70%

Sandefjord H

Norwegian Eliteserien

0 - 1 L

50%

HamKam A

Norwegian Eliteserien

5 - 1 W

55%

Tromsø H

Norwegian Eliteserien

1 - 2 L

63%

Kristiansund A

Norwegian Eliteserien

2 - 3 L

48%

Bologna A

UEFA Europa League

0 - 1 L

61%

Bologna H

UEFA Europa League

0 - 1 L

56%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Marseille has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 53.7) compared to Brann (SoS: 42.3). This means Marseille's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Brann holds the attacking edge with 1.9 goals per match versus Marseille's 1.1, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Marseille conceding 1.3 and Brann conceding 1.4 per match.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.9 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by the day's form, tactical adjustments, and perhaps a moment of individual brilliance.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Marseille

Brann

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair