Compare Marseille vs Dender

Marseille vs Dender Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Marseille vs Dender: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Marseille Home Team

Dender Away Team

Marseille

45.3

W L D L W L L W W D

Last 10 Matches

Dender

33.6

L W L L L W L L D D

Categories Won

Marseille

Draw

Dender

Performance Radar

Marseille

Dender

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

40%

4W, 2D, 4L

20%

2W, 2D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match

1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-2

-8

Clean Sheet

30%

3 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

M. Greenwood (3 goals)

D. Hrnčár (2 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 7

1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 3

Home Win Rate

40%

2W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

40%

2W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

53.7

League Difficulty: 81.9, Opponent Quality: 59.9

44.9

League Difficulty: 62.4, Opponent Quality: 57.1

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 2 matches

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.17

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: -0.07

1.01

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.01

Adjusted Power Rating

45.3

Attack: 38.0, Defense: 58.8, Form: 41.5

33.6

Attack: 31.6, Defense: 38.0, Form: 19.0

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Marseille

Dender

Power Rating Breakdown

45.3

Overall

Attack 38.0

Defense 58.8

Form 41.5

Consistency 44.8

Power Rating Breakdown

33.6

Overall

Attack 31.6

Defense 38.0

Form 19.0

Consistency 59.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

81.9 vs 62.4

Opponent Quality

59.9 vs 57.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Marseille

Dender

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Le Havre A

French Ligue 1

1 - 0 W

58%

Nantes A

French Ligue 1

0 - 3 L

56%

Nice H

French Ligue 1

1 - 1 D

55%

Lorient A

French Ligue 1

0 - 2 L

69%

Metz H

French Ligue 1

3 - 1 W

43%

Monaco A

French Ligue 1

1 - 2 L

77%

Lille H

French Ligue 1

1 - 2 L

73%

Auxerre H

French Ligue 1

1 - 0 W

66%

Toulouse A

French Ligue 1

1 - 0 W

62%

Toulouse H

Coupe de France

2 - 2 D

40%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

ZW A

Belgian First Division A

1 - 2 L

59%

La Louvière H

Belgian First Division A

2 - 1 W

38%

Cercle Brugge A

Belgian First Division A

1 - 2 L

51%

Cercle Brugge H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 4 L

46%

ZW H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 2 L

65%

La Louvière A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 0 W

54%

Gent H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 3 L

58%

R. Union SG A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 2 L

80%

Charleroi H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 2 D

57%

Cercle Brugge A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 0 D

63%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 53.7 vs 44.9), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Marseille averaging 1.1 and Dender averaging 1.0 goals per match.

Marseille has the defensive edge, conceding 1.3 per match compared to Dender's 1.8.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.6 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Marseille has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 11.7 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Marseille

Dender

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair