Skip to content
Compare Marseille vs Go Ahead

Marseille vs Go Ahead Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Marseille vs Go Ahead: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Marseille Marseille Home Team
Go Ahead Go Ahead Away Team
Marseille
45.3
W L D L W L L W W D

Last 10 Matches

Go Ahead
56.1
L D D D W L W L W W

Categories Won

3

Marseille

3

Draw

9

Go Ahead

Performance Radar

Marseille
Go Ahead

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 2D, 4L

40%

4W, 3D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-2

-2

+8

+8

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Greenwood (3 goals)
J. Breum (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 12
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

50%

3W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
53.7

League Difficulty: 81.9, Opponent Quality: 59.9

53.2

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 60.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 3 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.17

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: -0.07

2.0

Actual: 2.0 | Diff: 0.0

Adjusted Power Rating
45.3

Attack: 38.0, Defense: 58.8, Form: 41.5

56.1

Attack: 68.8, Defense: 61.9, Form: 41.3

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

4
1

16-30'

2
1

31-45'

2
3

46-60'

5
1

61-75'

4
3

76-90+'

3
Marseille
Go Ahead
Marseille

Power Rating Breakdown

45.3

Overall

Attack 38.0
Defense 58.8
Form 41.5
Consistency 44.8
Go Ahead

Power Rating Breakdown

56.1

Overall

Attack 68.8
Defense 61.9
Form 41.3
Consistency 50.5

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

81.9 vs 80.0

Opponent Quality

59.9 vs 60.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Marseille logo Marseille
W
Le Havre (58%)
L
Nantes (56%)
D
Nice (55%)
L
Lorient (69%)
W
Metz (43%)
L
Monaco (77%)
L
Lille (73%)
W
Auxerre (66%)
Go Ahead logo Go Ahead
L
PSV (75%)
D
Sparta (49%)
D
AZ (67%)
D
Groningen (66%)
W
Zwolle (54%)
L
Utrecht (75%)
W
NAC (49%)
L
Twente (76%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Le Havre A
1 - 0 W
58%
Nantes A
0 - 3 L
56%
Nice H
1 - 1 D
55%
Lorient A
0 - 2 L
69%
Metz H
3 - 1 W
43%
Monaco A
1 - 2 L
77%
Lille H
1 - 2 L
73%
Auxerre H
1 - 0 W
66%
Toulouse A
1 - 0 W
62%
Toulouse H
2 - 2 D
40%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
PSV H
1 - 4 L
75%
Sparta A
2 - 2 D
49%
AZ H
0 - 0 D
67%
Groningen A
0 - 0 D
66%
Zwolle H
5 - 0 W
54%
Utrecht A
0 - 2 L
75%
NAC H
6 - 0 W
49%
Twente H
1 - 4 L
76%
Excelsior A
1 - 0 W
60%
Heracles H
4 - 0 W
36%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 53.7 vs 53.2), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Go Ahead holds the attacking edge with 2.0 goals per match versus Marseille's 1.1, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Marseille conceding 1.3 and Go Ahead conceding 1.2 per match.

Go Ahead has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Go Ahead has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 10.8 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Marseille

Marseille

VS
Go Ahead

Go Ahead

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more