Compare Marseille vs Istra

Marseille vs Istra Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Marseille vs Istra: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Marseille Home Team

Istra Away Team

Marseille

45.3

W L D L W L L W W D

Last 10 Matches

Istra

35.8

W W L L L L L W W L

Categories Won

Marseille

Draw

Istra

Performance Radar

Marseille

Istra

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

40%

4W, 2D, 4L

40%

4W, 0D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match

1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-2

-3

Clean Sheet

30%

3 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

50%

5 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

50%

5 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

M. Greenwood (3 goals)

S. Prevljak (4 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 7

1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 4

Home Win Rate

40%

2W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate

40%

2W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

53.7

League Difficulty: 81.9, Opponent Quality: 59.9

34.5

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 47.2

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 2 matches

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.17

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: -0.07

0.93

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.07

Adjusted Power Rating

45.3

Attack: 38.0, Defense: 58.8, Form: 41.5

35.8

Attack: 28.2, Defense: 47.9, Form: 33.8

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Marseille

Istra

Power Rating Breakdown

45.3

Overall

Attack 38.0

Defense 58.8

Form 41.5

Consistency 44.8

Power Rating Breakdown

35.8

Overall

Attack 28.2

Defense 47.9

Form 33.8

Consistency 35.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

81.9 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

59.9 vs 47.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Marseille

Istra

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Le Havre A

French Ligue 1

1 - 0 W

58%

Nantes A

French Ligue 1

0 - 3 L

56%

Nice H

French Ligue 1

1 - 1 D

55%

Lorient A

French Ligue 1

0 - 2 L

69%

Metz H

French Ligue 1

3 - 1 W

43%

Monaco A

French Ligue 1

1 - 2 L

77%

Lille H

French Ligue 1

1 - 2 L

73%

Auxerre H

French Ligue 1

1 - 0 W

66%

Toulouse A

French Ligue 1

1 - 0 W

62%

Toulouse H

Coupe de France

2 - 2 D

40%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Osijek A

Croatia Prva HNL

1 - 0 W

46%

Slaven H

Croatia Prva HNL

3 - 1 W

35%

Gorica A

Croatia Prva HNL

0 - 1 L

50%

Dinamo Zagreb H

Croatia Prva HNL

0 - 2 L

71%

Vukovar H

Croatia Prva HNL

1 - 2 L

32%

Lokomotiva A

Croatia Prva HNL

0 - 2 L

49%

Hajduk H

Croatia Prva HNL

1 - 3 L

53%

Varaždin H

Croatia Prva HNL

2 - 1 W

48%

Rijeka A

Croatia Prva HNL

2 - 0 W

48%

Osijek H

Croatia Prva HNL

0 - 1 L

40%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Marseille has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 53.7) compared to Istra (SoS: 34.5). This means Marseille's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Marseille averaging 1.1 and Istra averaging 1.0 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with Marseille conceding 1.3 and Istra conceding 1.3 per match.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.4 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Marseille has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 9.5 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Marseille

Istra

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair