Skip to content
Compare Marseille vs Kielce

Marseille vs Kielce Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Marseille vs Kielce: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Marseille Marseille Home Team
Kielce Kielce Away Team
Marseille
45.3
W L D L W L L W W D

Last 10 Matches

Kielce
39.9
L D D L D L W L W L

Categories Won

8

Marseille

5

Draw

2

Kielce

Performance Radar

Marseille
Kielce

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 2D, 4L

20%

2W, 3D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-2

-2

-4

-4

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Greenwood (3 goals)
M. Pięczek (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 5
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
53.7

League Difficulty: 81.9, Opponent Quality: 59.9

54.1

League Difficulty: 57.0, Opponent Quality: 52.1

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.17

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: -0.07

1.02

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.08

Adjusted Power Rating
45.3

Attack: 38.0, Defense: 58.8, Form: 41.5

39.9

Attack: 38.2, Defense: 52.0, Form: 20.8

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

1

16-30'

4
1

31-45'

2
3

46-60'

2
1

61-75'

1
3

76-90+'

2
Marseille
Kielce
Marseille

Power Rating Breakdown

45.3

Overall

Attack 38.0
Defense 58.8
Form 41.5
Consistency 44.8
Kielce

Power Rating Breakdown

39.9

Overall

Attack 38.2
Defense 52.0
Form 20.8
Consistency 61.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

81.9 vs 57.0

Opponent Quality

59.9 vs 52.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Marseille logo Marseille
W
Le Havre (58%)
L
Nantes (56%)
D
Nice (55%)
L
Lorient (69%)
W
Metz (43%)
L
Monaco (77%)
L
Lille (73%)
W
Auxerre (66%)
Kielce logo Kielce
L
Raków (59%)
D
Piast (53%)
D
GKS Katowice (59%)
L
Górnik (58%)
D
Jagiellonia (48%)
L
Lechia (51%)
W
Arka (44%)
L
Pogoń (54%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Le Havre A
1 - 0 W
58%
Nantes A
0 - 3 L
56%
Nice H
1 - 1 D
55%
Lorient A
0 - 2 L
69%
Metz H
3 - 1 W
43%
Monaco A
1 - 2 L
77%
Lille H
1 - 2 L
73%
Auxerre H
1 - 0 W
66%
Toulouse A
1 - 0 W
62%
Toulouse H
2 - 2 D
40%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Raków A
0 - 2 L
59%
Piast H
1 - 1 D
53%
GKS Katowice H
1 - 1 D
59%
Górnik A
0 - 1 L
58%
Jagiellonia H
1 - 1 D
48%
Lechia A
2 - 4 L
51%
Arka H
3 - 0 W
44%
Pogoń A
1 - 2 L
54%
Nieciecza H
2 - 1 W
36%
Motor A
0 - 2 L
59%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 53.7 vs 54.1), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Marseille averaging 1.1 and Kielce averaging 1.1 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with Marseille conceding 1.3 and Kielce conceding 1.5 per match.

Kielce has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.5 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Marseille has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 5.4 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Marseille

Marseille

VS
Kielce

Kielce

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more